The Bankrupt Inn - Part 10

IF

dojoman wrote: »

I`m fine IF, bit peed off with the forum at the moment but hey ho thats life:)

I am sorry Dojo, deep breath's eh!! :beer: xx

Got us a cuppa in :A

dojoman

ifwisheswerehorses... wrote: »

I am sorry Dojo, deep breath's eh!! :beer: xx

Got us a cuppa in :A

Thanks for that IF:D but me thinks I need something stronger:) JD and coke anyone?

iquit

Hello everyone, just wanted to pop in and share this pretty bouquet. I hope everyone is well and not facing too many challenges. If you are, stay strong. A very big thank you to those who keep this forum going - you know who you are. You give your time to support, encourage and advise- for little or no reward, sorry you sometimes cross paths with trolls and unpleasant characters. Just know your efforts are appreciated.

IF

Awww thats lovely IQ

iquit

ifwisheswerehorses... wrote: »

Awww thats lovely IQ

I just thought sometimes we need to be nicer to each other .

IF

Good evening all, just popped in for a nightcap x

iquit wrote: »

I just thought sometimes we need to be nicer to each other .

I know :A

IF

Happy Birthday Phil xx

magicgirl

happy birthday phil.

hope everyone is well this fine sunny morning. (its sunny here anyway..)

IF

I am well thank you MG, just got the sun now so fingers crossed it stays a while

alastairq

good afternoon all....just had a brief rain shower, hanging baskets now heading back skywards...

spent early morning supporting a picket line....

interesting observation concerning some views that its about time the government restricted Union activities.....especially regarding percentage of Union membership voting for action?


of course, to be fair, such voting rules should also be imposed upon ... say....local Council elections?

Or..... parliamentary elections?

or, how we chose a Prime Minister????

ooops, oh dear, nobody seemed to like that idea, recently...apparently?


Or are we now living in a country where it's 'one rule for some, another rule for others?'

I believe strongly that, if segments of the working population are expected to suffer in order to get this country back on its feet, then that suffering should begin at the top.

What people forget is, firstly, those who worked within the public sector [civil servants, for example] accepted a lower wage level because certain more beneficial condition's were attached.


the wages haven't changed.......so....?

Plus, most of the pensions concerned are really peanut-payers anyway.....a huge percentage of not-a-lot is really very little.