We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
1 in 5 fears the sack
lemonjelly
Posts: 8,014 Forumite
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-12362171
:eek:
Increasing to 1 in 3 in the public sector.
So, is it any suprise that consumer confidence is low?
And in a time where household budgets are tight anyway, this is just one extra pressure.
So what happened to this consumer led recovery?
And further, how come such a high percentage of pricate sector staff are worried? they're supposed to be creating millions of vacancies for all the public sector hangers on?
:eek:
Increasing to 1 in 3 in the public sector.
So, is it any suprise that consumer confidence is low?
And in a time where household budgets are tight anyway, this is just one extra pressure.
So what happened to this consumer led recovery?
And further, how come such a high percentage of pricate sector staff are worried? they're supposed to be creating millions of vacancies for all the public sector hangers on?
It's getting harder & harder to keep the government in the manner to which they have become accustomed.
0
Comments
-
Doesn't surprise me really, in my area (public sector) its basically 1 in 1. Last few weeks has seen morale plummet.Faith, hope, charity, these three; but the greatest of these is charity.0
-
what was the number in 'normal' times?0
-
1 in 5 fears the sack
But from this point, only another 1 in 75 will actually get the sack. The constant media doom-mongering is not doing this country any favours, as such fear leads to a reduction in spending.
And of course, the more people fear, and the more people save, the more likely they are to ultimately lose their jobs....“The great enemy of the truth is very often not the lie – deliberate, contrived, and dishonest – but the myth, persistent, persuasive, and unrealistic.
Belief in myths allows the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought.”
-- President John F. Kennedy”0 -
HAMISH_MCTAVISH wrote: »But from this point, only another 1 in 75 will actually get the sack.
And another 9 in 75 already have the sack?
Yet another Hamish stat picked from an active imagination.Not Again0 -
lemonjelly wrote: »So what happened to this consumer led recovery?
We need an export driven and investment led recovery not a consumer one. Consumers overall need to reduce level of debt.0 -
But I thought it was meant to be a jobless recovery?lemonjelly wrote: »
If you're earning £44 a day for sitting on your bottom in your house, you don't need a job.
Or benefits.
It's a whole new economic system.Long live the faces of t'wunty.0 -
what was the number in 'normal' times?
No idea, I couldn't even find the original survey they used to get to the 1 in 5. I don't think it is likely to be anywhere near as high as this in normal times, but I think people were a lot more scared than this at the peak of the panic...
It doesn't help the economy, though, because scared people don't buy stuff.“The ideas of debtor and creditor as to what constitutes a good time never coincide.”
― P.G. Wodehouse, Love Among the Chickens0 -
RenovationMan wrote: »And to achieve both, we need to keep interest rates low. This results in a low £, which makes our exports attractive overseas and low savings rates forces people to actively invest their money rather than to lock it away in a bank account.
Follow the wider trends don't focus on one measure alone. "Money" is increasingly costing more. Particularly for the banks for example. As the UK is a net borrower, international money markets will influence rates significantly.
Never been advisable to lock huge sums of money away in a bank account.0 -
Thrugelmir wrote: »Follow the wider trends don't focus on one measure alone. "Money" is increasingly costing more. Particularly for the banks for example. As the UK is a net borrower, international money markets will influence rates significantly.
Never been advisable to lock huge sums of money away in a bank account.
As long as we maintain our AAA rating, we hold the whip hand. Where else will people invest without the fear of losing their shirt?0 -
It's a totally meaningless survey. Ask people if they fear losing their jobs - what do you expect them to say? People want attention and sympathy and our default position is to think of ourselves as victims or unfairly treated. Psychology 101.
I'm surprised it's not 4 out of 5, let alone 1.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
