We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Fixed Rates - Lowest inital rate or lowest subsequent rate

Hi,

I'm looking at taking out a mortgage very soon and had chosen one from the Woolwich (4.19% 2yr then 2.99%) because of its low subsequent rate. I'm now wondering if its best to go for the mortgage with the cheapest initial rate (e.g. ING 3.69% then 3.5%).

The cost over 2 years is much less with ING but over 4 years+ the Woolwich will start to be cheaper. I have little knowledge of re-mortgaging so not sure if it would be cost effective to go for the low rate and change after 2 years.

Anyone have any advice for this?

Thanks,
Rich

Purchase price £185000
Deposit £37000 (20%)

Comments

  • are people genuinely this stupid?
  • beecher2
    beecher2 Posts: 3,677 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Why are you taking a 2 year deal? I'd go for a longer deal to save having to pay out more fees, particularly when your LTV might be above 80% after 2 years.
  • The White horse : Ok, but i'd still appreciate your advice.

    beecher2 : The longer fixed deals I've seen all have much higher rates.
  • Thrugelmir
    Thrugelmir Posts: 89,546 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    If property prices fall. Then your remortgaging options in 2 years time could be affected. As your LTV could well be higher.
  • The_White_Horse
    The_White_Horse Posts: 3,315 Forumite
    edited 19 January 2011 at 1:23AM
    the point is, what it follows on to is not set in stone. those are the current rates. if the base rate is 5% when your fix ends, the rate you will go on to is 7.49% not 2.99% as you think. the ING rate of 3.5% is variable and may in fact be less than the woolwich rate if base is 5%, it may be 6.99% - who knows.
  • Yes, i am aware that the follow on rate is not set, but as we dont know what rates will be in 2 years ive just assumed that it would be a relative rise across all products. Maybe this is wrong.

    If rates were to rise by 2% then the woolwich would go to 4.99%, so would the variable rate rise by 2% also (5.5%) or would it not go as high?
  • alexlyne
    alexlyne Posts: 740 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 500 Posts Combo Breaker
    Going for a 2 year fix just because it's cheaper than 3 or 5 years is not a very good way of thinking about mortgages. If you're buying a telly, then fine, go to the place that sells them cheaper.

    I think that almost 100% of people expect a small rise in rates this year, followed by more in the next couple of years, probably dribbled in. In 2 years time, banks will still be trying to screw us out of money, so the fixed rates will probably be comparatively higher than they were a few years back compared to the base rate. Only after that (perhaps) will mortgage rates become competitive again.

    Oh and hey, whatever you do, you do realise that once your next fix is over, you are allowed to move provider?
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.8K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.7K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.3K Life & Family
  • 258.4K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.