We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Pensions advice - what to do?
Comments
-
Does anyone have references on this that I could look up?
At this time it is mostly media speculation. However, you can look up the draft proposals for the NPSS.
There has been speculation a number of times in the past but it is still here. Some think it will remain unchanged, others think it will cease to be tax free and some think it will be removed outright to force an increased income.
Moves like having no reference to it in the early drafts of the NPSS (which will probably replace stakeholder pensions) and renaming it from tax free cash to pension commencement lump sum have just fuelled the speculation.
Remember that to many people the the move to 25% across the board meant they got less lump sum benefit, not more.I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.0 -
Note that the NPSS is not expected to be introduced until 2012.It is indeed true that the opportunity to take at least 25% tax free cash (pension commencement lump sum) has been recently extended to protected rights pensions, AVCS, FSAVCs, indeed all types of pension products.
So it might seem odd that they would then turn around and cancel it entirely: however where they spot "abuse" the govt has been known to make abrupt U turns.
So it might be sensible to take a "use it or lose it" approach and claim it if you can, particularly if you are a basic rate taxpayer: because if the 25% TFC was taken away, that would mean you would have received no tax relief at all on your pension contributions: very nasty.
One other possible interpretation of the name change to PCLS is that the Govt plans to still allow the 25% lump sum to be taken in cash in future, but might tax it. But it seems to rule out any idea of stopping the extraction of a cash lump sum entirely, another unpleasant thought.
There's no doubt about it, pensions are subject to severe regulation risk.Trying to keep it simple...
0 -
Now I am confused! I've got ages till I retire! I just want to make sure that I will have my teacher's pension + a bit more so I can travel and be comfortable. I'd like to be able to help ot my daughter if needed as well without really hurting myself too much financially!THE LONG AND THE SLOW ROAD SEEM TO APPLY TO DEBTS AND DIETS... THE TWO THINGS I WANT TO SEE THE BACK OF...:D0
-
georgiasmum, teachers pension for your main steady pension income, ISA for the flexible money. And possibly any lump sum the pension pays.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.3K Spending & Discounts
- 247.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.3K Life & Family
- 261.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards