We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

appeal

InA
InA Posts: 229 Forumite
Part of the Furniture 100 Posts Combo Breaker
have been asked to delete
«1

Comments

  • if he hasn't worked there for 51 weeks or more then he has no protection
    The Googlewhacker referance is to Dave Gorman and not to my opinion of the search engine!

    If I give you advice it is only a view and always always take professional advice before acting!!!

    4 people on the ignore list....Bliss!
  • DVardysShadow
    DVardysShadow Posts: 18,949 Forumite
    I think he should raise a grievance that he was misled over the renewed appeal. And then consider taking it to employment tribunal.

    Finally, he should report the matter to the HSE.
    Hi, we’ve had to remove your signature. If you’re not sure why please read the forum rules or email the forum team if you’re still unsure - MSE ForumTeam
  • a - how long was he working there?
    b - are you saying that he asked for a different date, they said he could appeal in writing but they changed the date as requested and he did not attend?
    c - is this an actual construction company? Or was he working for another non-construction company...it's just very very rare for construction companies not to have hard hats....so if it was another company then did they do any H&S training at all? Any inductions?
    If you haven't got it - please don't flaunt it. TIA.
  • InA
    InA Posts: 229 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts Combo Breaker
    edited 13 March 2012 at 2:44PM
    have been asked to delete
  • Has he ever had any H&S training, was a risk assessment done on this site, was he ever issued with PPE?

    I'd call HSE now to be honest and get their take on the matter. Also, ACAS for the disciplinary procedure.
    If you haven't got it - please don't flaunt it. TIA.
  • DVardysShadow
    DVardysShadow Posts: 18,949 Forumite
    InA wrote: »
    dvardyshadow, should we contact HSE before going to tribunal or will that effect the tribunal? or are we supposed to keep things confdential until after the tribunal?
    It won't affect the tribunal directly. I suppose it could backfire if the employer gets a report from HSE which puts them in the clear - but I doubt that would happen. Really he should have reported it immediately. Now, I think the time to do it is after all processes with the employer have been exhausted or after reinstatement.

    It is disgraceful make someone work near a building where there is danger of collapse - particularly if it is evidenced by falling masonry.
    Hi, we’ve had to remove your signature. If you’re not sure why please read the forum rules or email the forum team if you’re still unsure - MSE ForumTeam
  • cletus1
    cletus1 Posts: 62 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10 Posts Combo Breaker
    edited 30 December 2010 at 4:56PM
    His length of service would be irrelevant as he was refusing to work on the grounds of safety he is therefore protected under the 1974 health and safety at work act from detriment

    As the previous posters have said you should lodge a grievance about the way the employer has dealt with the appeal and ask them for a new date, take a look at your employers discipline policy and what it says regarding non-attendance at such meetings
    You should also lodge an ET1 (tribunal application) you can do this on line you should claim unfair dismissal, the employers refusal to hold an appeal meeting and that this was a result of him refusing to work on the grounds of health and safety

    you only have three months form the date of dismissal to do this !
  • Uncertain
    Uncertain Posts: 3,901 Forumite
    if he hasn't worked there for 51 weeks or more then he has no protection

    He has under these circumstances!
  • hartcjhart
    hartcjhart Posts: 9,463 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    InA wrote: »
    my son was dismissed from his job because he refused to work near a building that was near collapse. a brick nearly hit his head, no hard hat, nothing.

    he was dismissed for insubordinence which he appealed. but he was due in hospitl for an operation on the same day as his appeal. he spoke to manager to let him know aand asked if he could move it to the week before his op. the manager said he wasn't available then, so it was agreed to let my son send his appeal in writing.

    he got a letter confirming the new date and thought nothing more about it because it was already agreed that he would send his appeal in by then. there seemed to be nothing fishy about this.

    but when he got a letter for the appeal decision, it said that he didn't turn up at the hearing, so the dismissal was not overturned! now, we've still got the recorded delivery slip and a copy of the letter.

    we went to the CAB to see what we could do about an unfair dismissal claim, but the lady told us it wasn't likely because he didn't go to the appeal.

    is this right? can they lie like this and get away with it scot free? does sending an appeal in writing not count?

    we are worried sick. thanks in advance.


    when you say that do you mean that your son gave the boss a load of verbal abuse while refusing to work?

    His boss is responsible to ensure the safety of the workforce(duty of care)and to carry out risk assesments before any work is started,these should be in writing and shown to all employees working on that site,and any PPE needed issued to them

    he clearly has not done this so a call to the HSE should be made

    and has been mentioned you should contact ACAS as soon as poss
    I :love: MOJACAR
  • cletus1
    cletus1 Posts: 62 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10 Posts Combo Breaker
    edited 30 December 2010 at 6:20PM
    use the items below as a template ofr your ET application cut n paste after you have edited it in to section 5.1 on the grounds for claim




    1 I was employed by Bloggs construction, the respondent; since 22 March 2009

    2. The respondent dismissed me for gross misconduct on the 18th December 2010 EDT

    3. On the 10th December 2010 I advised the respondent that I was not willing to carry out their instructions to work on the grounds of health and safety as I believed to do so would place me in imminent danger.

    4. The respondent invited me to attend a disciplinary hearing I was charged with gross misconduct in that I was insubordinate to a manger

    5. The respondent did not advise me of my representation rights

    6. The respondent had not provided me with any personal protective equipment.

    7. The respondent had failed to carry out suitable and sufficient assessment of risks which I was being exposed to.

    8. The respondent had failed to give me proper training to minimise and control risks that I was likely to be exposed to

    9. Following the dismissal the respondent had failed to hold an appeal meeting.

    10. On the 22nd December 2010 I submitted a grievance to the respondent for their failure to hold an appeal meeting
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 353.8K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 246.9K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.2K Life & Family
  • 260.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.