We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
No to HMS;3% Over Higher limit, Northern Rock 'Together'
Options

markan2828
Posts: 17 Forumite

:(Hi everyone,
I would love any members thoughts on my current dilema, and the response to it by NR.
I first took out a 'together' mortgage some 8 years ago, for a total of approx. £250,000, that was ported to my current home 3 years later, and as my current property required substantial improvements, NR made a number of further advances until the works were complete. The balance was then £435,000. (by now late 2006). As the main loan is interest only this remained the balance until recently.
I had not missed a payment, then, disaster struck as the company I was working for (20 years ) went into liquidation.
I managed to find alternative employment quite soon, but with a much lower (starting ) salary.
I have kept NR informed throughout, and as I expected my new job to develop ( it is in sales ) over the following 12/18 months to a point where I could re-comence full payments, and begin to reduce arrears, they agrreed to initialy accept 2 periods of reduced payments,-2x £600, and 3x£701.
These payments were made without prompting, and I was aghast when I contacted them to agree a new increased amount beginning with my december payment to be advised that they were instructing
solicitors, as they were unwilling to accept a steadily increasing payment and required the full amount only.
I questioned the option of the 'HMS' scheme, and was informed that I would have qualified on all counts other than the secured part of the loan was approx £410,000 as apposed to the ceiling of £400,000.
This seems harsh and unreasonable, but I would appreciate any thoughts.
Thanks and regards
I would love any members thoughts on my current dilema, and the response to it by NR.
I first took out a 'together' mortgage some 8 years ago, for a total of approx. £250,000, that was ported to my current home 3 years later, and as my current property required substantial improvements, NR made a number of further advances until the works were complete. The balance was then £435,000. (by now late 2006). As the main loan is interest only this remained the balance until recently.
I had not missed a payment, then, disaster struck as the company I was working for (20 years ) went into liquidation.
I managed to find alternative employment quite soon, but with a much lower (starting ) salary.
I have kept NR informed throughout, and as I expected my new job to develop ( it is in sales ) over the following 12/18 months to a point where I could re-comence full payments, and begin to reduce arrears, they agrreed to initialy accept 2 periods of reduced payments,-2x £600, and 3x£701.
These payments were made without prompting, and I was aghast when I contacted them to agree a new increased amount beginning with my december payment to be advised that they were instructing
solicitors, as they were unwilling to accept a steadily increasing payment and required the full amount only.
I questioned the option of the 'HMS' scheme, and was informed that I would have qualified on all counts other than the secured part of the loan was approx £410,000 as apposed to the ceiling of £400,000.
This seems harsh and unreasonable, but I would appreciate any thoughts.
Thanks and regards
0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.6K Spending & Discounts
- 244K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.3K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards