We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Ultimatum on SSP

2»

Comments

  • cavework
    cavework Posts: 1,992 Forumite
    From experience you are issued with a fit note from your Doctor to cover up to 28 weeks SSP.
    After that if you are still unfit to return to work you will then be switched to ESA.
    During the time you are on ESA you will still be deemed to be employed and will still accrue holiday entitlement
    The fit note will state that you are either unfit to work or can return based on advice the Doctor gives
    ie staggered return ..reduced hours
    make a change in the type of work due to the illness/abscence .. This fit note states 'if the employer can accomodate these changes' It is advisory
    If the employer cannot accomodate the changes then the employee can remain on SSP for the full 28 week period .
    If the Employee cannot return to work ever again based on medical advice, then the employer can look at dismissal on the grounds of capability prior to the 28 week period or after.
    The dismissal will include payment for notice period and any holiday accrued.
  • mjm3346
    mjm3346 Posts: 47,375 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    ever wrote: »
    Thank you for the information, all!



    He's 23 and has worked there since February 2009, so quite far away from the retirement-type age. I keep thinking that termination = bad because of how it might look to future employers, but it's extremely unlikely he'll ever be able to work again, so I suppose I need to get that thought out of my head.

    Sorry about the circumstances.
    Let the employers go for termination, it may take a bit longer so he gets a bit more money and benefits wise there is no chance of anyone wanting to look into why he resigned or trying to delay payment because he gave up work (they probably wouldn't make a fuss but it removes the risk).
  • Entitlement to SSP ends when the employers liability ends. Your employers liability ends if:

    You are no longer sick or
    You have had 28 weeks SSP or
    Your contract of employment comes to an end.

    SSP will also end if your employer considers you capababily of working.

    Hope this helps
  • Indie_Kid
    Indie_Kid Posts: 23,100 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    mjm3346 wrote: »
    Sorry about the circumstances.
    Let the employers go for termination, it may take a bit longer so he gets a bit more money and benefits wise there is no chance of anyone wanting to look into why he resigned or trying to delay payment because he gave up work (they probably wouldn't make a fuss but it removes the risk).

    For ESA claims, this is irrelevant.
    Sealed pot challenge #232. Gold stars from Sue-UU - :staradmin :staradmin £75.29 banked
    50p saver #40 £20 banked
    Virtual sealed pot #178 £80.25
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 353.5K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.1K Spending & Discounts
  • 246.6K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.1K Life & Family
  • 260.6K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.