We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
'Should big banks have an ENFORCED public service remit?' blog discussion
Comments
-
The problem with set off is that the Bank cannot win
They certainly seem to be winning in this instance:
''Client told us that their bank has stated that they were exercising their right of set off to deduct payments from their bank account to pay towards a credit card. However, the bank would always take just under the minimum payment on the card. In doing so they would receive the majority of their money but would also charge the client for late payments to the credit card as the minimum payment had not been met.''
0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.7K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454K Spending & Discounts
- 244.7K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.3K Life & Family
- 258.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards