We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
NUS secretly pushed for drastic cuts in grants
Comments
-
Surely, if a student were able to get a degree in two years with the same grade as another took three years to complete, it would show that they are brighter, more hard working, or both. This would impress me as an employer.0
-
Surely, if a student were able to get a degree in two years with the same grade as another took three years to complete, it would show that they are brighter, more hard working, or both. This would impress me as an employer.
I think the research/theses argument has to be considered.
FWIW modular degrees can already be condensed a bit..or could''inmy day'' but it can be hard to get the institution to agree and IME you had to pay for the modules extra to your yearly allotted number. However, I am quite strongly of the opinion that modular learning and examination is not really as challenging for most and IME was fundamentally easier in its nature: not really such a great guideline for employers wanting academic ability/intellectual development in addition to the demonstrated hard work and ''hunger''.0 -
I did stress that this is between two students who achieved identical grades at finals. Do you think that examiners or assessors would downgrade the two year student even if the results were equal?0
-
I did stress that this is between two students who achieved identical grades at finals. Do you think that examiners or assessors would downgrade the two year student even if the results were equal?
No. My extra modules were marked as normal. BUT that is not to say that more is not required fro a second year than a first year.
I think % results would be the same, but outcomes..rather than result.. could nevertheless be different.
Also, borderline classes might be interesting. Demonstration of progression could be a factor...it was referred to a lot IME and one of the reasons ''condensing'' was frowned upon..
My guess is that more students means less fussing over grades. Perhaps less attention is given to ability other than cold percentage mark now? I don't know.0 -
The 'debts' students will leave with will be at least 27k if charged 9k per year. Throw in food, accommodation, books, travel, leisure and you are looking at around 45k.
I'm just glad I did my degree before this rubbish policy, sorry stitch up, came about.
I went to uni and worked two part time jobs.
I had a good lifestyle, and money always in my pocket.
I also got an easy 2.1 and could have got a 1st if I ever managed to open my books to study, but I didnt! My choice... don't think it would impact my life now if I did, 2.1 is more than acceptable grade.
If you dont like the debt/ fee's and money / cash flow issues, then dont go to uni, get a job and get them to pay for HND and then continuous development. Its not rocket science. If I was a potential student now, I would work hard on A levels and look for somewhere with on the job training, related to a field I wanted to work in.
However, I worked damn hard while at uni, to make sure I left virtually debt free. However the hard work started when I took a full time training job following uni to continue my professional education... times were really hard then!!!Plan
1) Get most competitive Lifetime Mortgage (Done)
2) Make healthy savings, spend wisely (Doing)
3) Ensure healthy pension fund - (Doing)
4) Ensure house is nice, suitable, safe, and located - (Done)
5) Keep everyone happy, healthy and entertained (Done, Doing, Going to do)0 -
Of course not, but the Tories are proposing to raise the cost of higher education for everyone; Aaron Porter's proposal was to raise it only for people who currently qualify for grants, including for people already at university dependent on grants. That's why I would say it's regressive.
aye. most student politicians come from highly moneyed backgrounds.
it makes perfect sense for the NUS to push for measures that cut support that's specifically targeted at the plebs in order to prevent the wealthy having to pay more.FACT.0 -
Erm not really.
If one uni charges less, one might see it as less quality over another uni that charges more.
lol I find it hard how a uni can be seen as attractive charging fees around the 6 to 9 k mark.
Overseas student fee levels you know.
That is probably because they are.'Just think for a moment what a prospect that is. A single market without barriers visible or invisible giving you direct and unhindered access to the purchasing power of over 300 million of the worlds wealthiest and most prosperous people' Margaret Thatcher0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 352K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.4K Life & Family
- 258.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards