We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Contracted out pensions misselling

Options
According to the Scotsman the FSA plans to produce a report on this in January which will find no widespread misselling, but concerns with some groups, mainly age related.

So if any complaints firms contact you, it's probably better to wait for the report, to see if you are affected before deciding on making a complaint.

DON'T deal with any firm that wants money upfront, and remember that pensions misselling redress money is not paid to you in cash,but directly into the pension fund, so you can't get at it until you are over 50, at the earliest.
Trying to keep it simple...;)

Comments

  • dunstonh
    dunstonh Posts: 119,662 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    The last FSA report said that they believe that around 200,000 to 400,000 people contracted out outside of the suggested age bands.

    In the scheme of things, that is quite a small number and these people can be identified. One of the options the FSA is considering is to get the advising companies to pro-actively check these cases to see if the advice stacks up.

    It should be noted that it doesnt mean that between 200-400 thousand were mis-sold. The recommended ages changed with different providers depending on the contract that was sold. So, a low charged contract could allow contracting out at an older age than the benchmark average. Also, some people would have chosen to contract out anyway because of Govt distrust.

    Whilst Which? state that 3/4 have lost out, in 1996, the SIB stated that everyone that contracted out upto that point was financially better off. A stockmarket crash would have made many worse off whilst a recovering stockmarket would put people back better off again. I do feel that Which? are looking at this in a very short term point of view. The fact that the SIB stated in 1996 that everyone was financially worse off has probably helped the current regulator come to its decision. After all, if the regulator in 1996 says people are better off, it cant really go back on that 10 years later. Especially as many would have used the 1996 information as supporting the recommendation to contract out.

    One thing is clear from this though. Dont use a claims company and especially not those rip off merchants from Morgan Green who will tell you anything just to get that £500 off you.
    I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.6K Spending & Discounts
  • 244K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.9K Life & Family
  • 257.3K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.