We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Mis-sold Endowment Policy, Another Approach?

2»

Comments

  • dunstonh
    dunstonh Posts: 120,179 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    ...but if you lie and are caught out with a lie, then other "grey" areas where perhaps the advisers documentation is not as strong, the person checking the complaint will be less inclined to believe you and favour the adviser.

    You can overdo a complaint and you should never lie.
    I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.
  • lindos90
    lindos90 Posts: 3,211 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    I never suggested they lie, I was giving an example that the ombudsman takes into account if someone has little financial knowledge and experience and is therefore taken advantage of by the advisor which is what the OP appeared to be thats all.....!!!!
  • The relevant case study is on Ombudsman news issue 44, ertainly in the low 40's. Just because someone says balanced or ticks a form which the consumer may or or may not see, this does not nedcessarily represent reality or the clients position. There should be some evidence of previous investment history or detailed explanation and comparators being provided as part of the sale. You can request a further Ombudsman ruling if you disagree with the adjudication and don't accept being fobbed off by the sometimes high handed tone of the adjudicators letters. If possible, refer them back to their own case study as suggested by lindos above

    I see far too many of these.... don't get me started
  • lindos90
    lindos90 Posts: 3,211 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    thanks for your support of my reply defender! im new to the forum and that ment alot!
  • vinno65
    vinno65 Posts: 290 Forumite
    Hi Justcallmeamug,
    DOTW is right.Keep on with your complaint how have they come to the conclusion that you were balanced investors? I would ask to see a copy of your file showing how they decided you were balanced? There have been examples of people signing forms where "balanced" or "cautious" were the lowest available options so you could not state you were risk averse even if you wanted too. As DOTW says they have to show that your financial history was taken into account i.e did you already have money invested in stocks and shares as this would point to you being prepared to take a risk.If all you had were a couple of building society deposit/current accounts then obviously it wouldn't.

    regards Vinno
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.4K Life & Family
  • 258.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.