We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Mortgage interest support
Comments
-
PasturesNew wrote: »Only once you'd been unemployed for 9 months. It's been changed, with a couple of schemes, to be paying out much sooner for the past couple of years, as a special 'helper' to those affected.
So, it's a new/short-term benefit that kicks in quicker.
I believe that prior to 1987 mortgage interest payments were paid strait way, then only 50% was paid for the first 16 weeks. Then in 1995 the 39-week wait was introduced.0 -
-
Max 2 years now isn't it?
Provided you qualify for income related benefits, looks as if it goes on indefinitely...
There is no limit to how long you can get SMI if you are getting:- Income Support
- income-related Employment and Support Allowance
- Pension Credit
http://www.direct.gov.uk/en/MoneyTaxAndBenefits/BenefitsTaxCreditsAndOtherSupport/On_a_low_income/DG_1803210 -
Provided you qualify for income related benefits, looks as if it goes on indefinitely...
Absolutely disgusting isn't it. I understand the reasons why it's socially desirable to avoid the upheaval of people being forced to leave their house, but frankly if you are on income related benefits for 2 years, you should probably be renting rather than living in your own house and having the taxpayer pay the interest of your 200,000 mortgage.0 -
Renters who work, pay tax who are not on any benefits and always pay their rent on time can still be forced to leave their home after six months and with just two months notice.Absolutely disgusting isn't it. I understand the reasons why it's socially desirable to avoid the upheaval of people being forced to leave their house, but frankly if you are on income related benefits for 2 years, you should probably be renting rather than living in your own house and having the taxpayer pay the interest of your 200,000 mortgage.0 -
Interest on £200,000 at 3.6% approx. £140 per week max housing benefit being restricted to £400 almost 3x as much.0
-
satchmeister wrote: »Renters who work, pay tax who are not on any benefits and always pay their rent on time can still be forced to leave their home after six months and with just two months notice.
Quite.
Though when it involves private housing, it would effectively bankrupt many people. That is not good for society (though I don't think the taxpayer should be bailing out private house owners for indefinite periods of time).0 -
Interest on £200,000 at 3.6% approx. £140 per week max housing benefit being restricted to £400 almost 3x as much.
True - it's not the fact that the interest is paid - it's the fact that it's indefinite. In principle people on benefits shouldn't be paid indefinitely to live in their house - there is social housing stock (well, maybe that should be "was") which is managed for this purpose. If people want to stay in their own house they should have an incentive to do this - a deadline.0 -
I think people are more likely to be claiming LHA long term than SMI.0
-
Absolutely disgusting isn't it. I understand the reasons why it's socially desirable to avoid the upheaval of people being forced to leave their house, but frankly if you are on income related benefits for 2 years, you should probably be renting rather than living in your own house and having the taxpayer pay the interest of your 200,000 mortgage.
You've still got to pay off the capital sooner or later so, I suppose, it catches up with you eventually and maybe the fall is harder, the older someone is.I think people are more likely to be claiming LHA long term than SMI.
That may be the case but I'm not so sure. With more 50 years+ workers facing redundancy, there will be increasing numbers of older workers who have not finished their mortgages and who will not get back into work imo.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.4K Life & Family
- 261.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards