We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Natwest/Triton/Green & Co

Hi. I am being chased for a debt from 2001 by Natwest. I have advised them that the debt is statute barred and they have continually ignored this. During the dispute (which has lasted almost 2 years now) I have made two separate CCA requests, receiving generic terms and conditions (unsigned) and no application form. They have also included a 'here is your new credit card' letter (but the two letters stated different addresses and no credit cards were ever to sent to either address) I have just received a last chance letter from Green & Co before court action is taken. How seriously should I take this threat? Are they likely to go to court for a debt which is almost ten years old, is less than five hundred pounds and for which they have been unable to provide a solid signed CCA. I kind of hope they do to be honest as it will allow me to put this to bed, I just wondered if anybody has any ideas of the likelihood.

Comments

  • fatbelly
    fatbelly Posts: 23,280 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Cashback Cashier
    If there was a six-year period of no acknowledgement of the debt (by you) by way of payment or in writing then the statute barred defence is uncontestable if they tried court action.

    If you are sure of your dates and haven't already done so, send the letter at the end of this factsheet:

    Factsheet | Liability for debts and the Limitation Act

    but you could amend it to emphasise that you have repeatedly informed them of this, and at the end add something like:

    'I now require your final response within eight weeks as I am intending to refer this matter to the Financial Ombudsman and Office of Fair Trading'

    If you had (have) a statute barred defence I wouldn't bother with a cca request. You did it twice?
  • FTW
    FTW Posts: 8,682 Forumite
    fatbelly wrote: »
    If there was a six-year period of no acknowledgement of the debt (by you) by way of payment or in writing then the statute barred defence is uncontestable if they tried court action.

    If you are sure of your dates and haven't already done so, send the letter at the end of this factsheet:

    Factsheet | Liability for debts and the Limitation Act

    but you could amend it to emphasise that you have repeatedly informed them of this, and at the end add something like:

    'I now require your final response within eight weeks as I am intending to refer this matter to the Financial Ombudsman and Office of Fair Trading'

    If you had (have) a statute barred defence I wouldn't bother with a cca request. You did it twice?


    Yep. Sound advice, and according to the OP, it sounds like this is well and truly statute barred.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 601K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259.1K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.