We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Bank of England must use QE to buy 'bad mortgages'

13

Comments

  • ILW
    ILW Posts: 18,333 Forumite
    StevieJ wrote: »
    Fair enough, so you don't understand.
    Seems our banks bought a load of rubbish bundled investments from dodgy US mortgage lenders. Why is that the Americans fault?
  • michaels
    michaels Posts: 29,227 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Whilst I agree with the general thrust of your argument I think the facts that you present are non sequiturs in this case. Also as per Hamish's point there is not necessarily any correlation between being in arrears and insufficient security for the banks.
    No.

    2.4% of mortgages are in arrears of 3 months or more.

    After 13 weeks, many people will get SMI help, so many of those in arrears never actually make it to the above figures, because of stimulus.

    I'd suggest the number in arrears is higher, and will grow with interest rate rises.

    I'd also suggest that the numbers in arrears above would be much much larger had it not been for the reduction to 13 weeks for SMI.

    Smoke and mirrors.
    I think....
  • System
    System Posts: 178,376 Community Admin
    10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Rather than buying the mortgages from the banks they should randomly choose people to clear the mortgages for, I'd enter that draw ;)
    This is a system account and does not represent a real person. To contact the Forum Team email forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com
  • StevieJ
    StevieJ Posts: 20,174 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    DervProf wrote: »
    I think I do. People will welcome anything that keeps the value of their homes up, because they feel that it`s what represents their wealth and financial wellbeing.

    Personally, I don`t care too much about the value of my home, it`s my salary, my bank balance and the cost of the next meal/litre of fuel/pint of beer/loaf of bread than concerns me.

    So being of the opinion that the credit crunch was caused by problems originating in the Us will actually, 'keep the value of their homes up' not sure how that works :)
    'Just think for a moment what a prospect that is. A single market without barriers visible or invisible giving you direct and unhindered access to the purchasing power of over 300 million of the worlds wealthiest and most prosperous people' Margaret Thatcher
  • ILW
    ILW Posts: 18,333 Forumite
    Joeskeppi wrote: »
    Rather than buying the mortgages from the banks they should randomly choose people to clear the mortgages for, I'd enter that draw ;)

    Just buy a lottery ticket.
  • System
    System Posts: 178,376 Community Admin
    10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    ILW wrote: »
    Just buy a lottery ticket.

    Already done that. Won a tenner last week :j
    This is a system account and does not represent a real person. To contact the Forum Team email forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com
  • ILW
    ILW Posts: 18,333 Forumite
    Joeskeppi wrote: »
    Already done that. Won a tenner last week :j

    Did you pay off your mortgage with it?
  • Conrad
    Conrad Posts: 33,137 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    I should flippin well hope so seeing as interest rates are rock bottom at the moment. But what happens Hamish when interest rates start to go up? :(


    Less than 1% were repossessed in the last recession with over 3m unemployed and far higher interest rates.

    Bearish types always overdo things - they told us in 2007 there would be carnage and mass repos but as ever they underestimate the Human capacity to muddle though.
  • michaels
    michaels Posts: 29,227 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    With all the talk about the impact of increasing interest rates does anyone know what the impact would be - for example quite a few must have fixes and other can probably afford to pay much higher rates.

    Personally (based on my mortgage advance) 11% would probably be putting me at the limit of what I could afford. How sensitive is everyone else?
    I think....
  • Conrad wrote: »
    Less than 1% were repossessed in the last recession with over 3m unemployed and far higher interest rates.

    Bearish types always overdo things - they told us in 2007 there would be carnage and mass repos but as ever they underestimate the Human capacity to muddle though.

    I don't think house prices were anywhere near what people have been paying for them over the last few years back then.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 258.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.