We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Mervyn King: UK House Prices Have Recovered 2/3 of Losses
Comments
- 
            Graham dear, are you not always explaining how economists are always wrong?
 Anyway, what about Mervyn, is he wrong or right today?
 The fact is that the article you brought up to confirm your analysis is actually confirming the argument you're arguing against. That's quite amusing in a way.
 Bit like the subconscience thing then, and getting your fingers burnt, isnt it 
 I have a soft spot for you Julie. However, are you Hamish's wife?0
- 
            A three bedroom house is well within the reach of London commuters for something just north of half that amount, and you shouldn't use an extreme example in a distorted part of the market (London) to make general conclusions on affordability.
 Likewise, you shouldn`t dismiss large portions of the market, such as London.30 Year Challenge : To be 30 years older. Equity : Don't know, don't care much. Savings : That's asking for ridicule.0
- 
            Then by definition, so are you because you're making an analysis based on the same facts I see. You've just jumped to different conclusions.
 "Too early to tell" isn`t really a conclusion to the situation in question. The conclusion will be seen after a longer period of tightened lending conditions (should that happen).
 I suppose you might argue about the semantics, but I think you understand the point I was making.30 Year Challenge : To be 30 years older. Equity : Don't know, don't care much. Savings : That's asking for ridicule.0
- 
            Graham_Devon wrote: »Bit like the subconscience thing then, and getting your fingers burnt, isnt it 
 I have a soft spot for you Julie. However, are you Hamish's wife?
 Graham, I wasn't going to push this because it's shooting at an ambulance and it was a cheap dig in the first place. But if you want to press the point, youu do definitely mean subconscious. As defined by Freud I think. Go and look it up.
 And a bit of sexism emerging from your own subconscious there too I suspect. What on earth would it matter to my arguments if I were Hamish's wife?
 But keep wriggling. Fact is you posted an argument that contradicted what you're saying. Nice trick :rotfl: Time for the Chewbacca defence...0
- 
            Graham_Devon wrote: »I have a soft spot for you Julie. However, are you Hamish's wife?
 Blimey Graham, are you trying to chat up Julie ?
 Why not offer her out for a date? You could take her to Comet to help you choose an LED TV.30 Year Challenge : To be 30 years older. Equity : Don't know, don't care much. Savings : That's asking for ridicule.0
- 
            Likewise, you shouldn`t dismiss large portions of the market, such as London.
 Indeed, so why not work on averages? If all flats were 400K then you'd have a point, but all you're really doing is cherrypicking an example to make a point which is not generally true.
 I think it's fair to dismiss a lot of the London market as unrepresentative, given the very extreme amount of competition to live there for various reasons.0
- 
            And a bit of sexism emerging from your own subconscious there too I suspect. What on earth would it matter to my arguments if I were Hamish's wife?
 Sexism? What? Because of the subconscience thing? Or was it fingers being burnt? The soft spot? Is that sexist?
 Genuinely confuddled. But nice to see the sexist remark pop out again 
 I'm not doing very well lately. I'm sexist and racist. And I still don't even have a LED TV to make up for it 0 0
This discussion has been closed.
            Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
 
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards

 
         