We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Mum-to-be stuck with 5.29% SVR - help!
Comments
-
If someone has 50% equity, they should sell the place and use the cash released to pay rent. Not expect taxpayers to go on paying for their mortgage for years to come. Possibly no more support after 1 year would be fair on all.0
-
But that is a different argument - ie that the state should not make any mortgage payments at all and expect people to sell their homes and use whatever equity they have to live off if they can not work. Or are you saying that those with no equity should have their mortgage paid but those who have not MEWed for holidays should get no support?If someone has 50% equity, they should sell the place and use the cash released to pay rent. Not expect taxpayers to go on paying for their mortgage for years to come. Possibly no more support after 1 year would be fair on all.I think....0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 351.7K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454K Spending & Discounts
- 244.7K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.3K Life & Family
- 258.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards