We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Incapacity benefit for dependant-is this taxable?

Hi,

I am currectly receiving incapacity for myself and also receive an extra £50 approx for my partner because we had a child 2 years ago. According to the above should the extra ib for my partner beause of having a baby be taxable?, I was reading the below thread and picked up on the post from Chrismac1

https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/2808114

I think for the first year the p60 showed taxable IB about 2k less that we receive, but just would like to know if the extra ib is taxable? as they say total ib is taxable now

Thanks very much for your kind help.

John

Comments

  • chrismac1
    chrismac1 Posts: 2,585 Forumite
    Income Tax (earnings and pensions act) 2003:

    676Increases in respect of children E+W+S+N.I.

    No liability to income tax arises on a part of a taxable benefit listed in Table A which is attributable to an increase in respect of a child.

    Unless contradicted by HMRC, this is still on the statute books.
    Hideous Muddles from Right Charlies
  • johnsmi
    johnsmi Posts: 232 Forumite
    Thanks Chrismac1 for your kind help on this. I did a google on the relavant legislation and it seems quite complicated especially since its my partner who gets the extra money (because she had a child) so I'm not sure if some of the ib is not taxable. I know that for year 08/09 the p60 from DWP give me a taxable income of less than 2 k that I actually received but 09/10 the p60 showed the full amount of ib taxable. Im just wondering would the tax people know about this if I ring them or if its better to ring the dwp to clarify the p60

    John
  • chrismac1
    chrismac1 Posts: 2,585 Forumite
    I wouldn't be too confident of the folk manning the helplines for HMRC having too much of a clue here. I am not blaming them. I've had to look this up in my tax manuals and the HMRC site - one hope for this new Government is that my reducing the tax code (which doubled under Labour) they can simplify things and reduce the work needed within HMRC as a result.
    Hideous Muddles from Right Charlies
  • johnsmi
    johnsmi Posts: 232 Forumite
    Just seen this after doing a google so it seems ib is taxable for my partner (even though its because she qualfies because she had a baby)

    http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/manuals/eimanual/eim76180.htm

    john
  • dmg24
    dmg24 Posts: 33,920 Forumite
    10,000 Posts
    chrismac1 wrote: »
    Income Tax (earnings and pensions act) 2003:

    676Increases in respect of children E+W+S+N.I.

    No liability to income tax arises on a part of a taxable benefit listed in Table A which is attributable to an increase in respect of a child.

    Unless contradicted by HMRC, this is still on the statute books.

    The dependent addition is not given in respect of a child, or indeed of having a child. johnsmi is correct, it is taxable.
    Gone ... or have I?
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.7K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.7K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.3K Life & Family
  • 258.4K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.