We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Bonfire day for the Quangos! 192 abolished, 289 reformed

245

Comments

  • Mr_Mumble wrote: »
    Oops, I thought the FT Blogs (I've renamed a couple that are from the blogs rather than FT site) were free to view, though they may require registration. The FT story about the OFT is paywalled, hence the excerpt, the FT did break this story but I've now included a link to the Telegraph rehash.

    With The Times and FT now paywalling its not easy to give paupers what they want without breaking the TOS. :p


    Cheers.


    I still cant find a full list anywhere & the Cabinet Office link is still down.


    Maybe they have made their IT guys redundant?
    Not Again
  • Blacklight
    Blacklight Posts: 1,565 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Looks like they shut down the Office for Government Website Bandwidth.
  • chewmylegoff
    chewmylegoff Posts: 11,469 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    dazeruk wrote: »
    We had a e-mail from Gus O'Donnell regarding the Civil Service Compensation Scheme.

    Main points are

    1) A standard tariff of one month’s salary for every year of pensionable service, limited to 21 months pay for voluntary redundancy (instead of the 15 originally proposed) and 12 months pay for compulsory redundancy. The intention would be to encourage voluntary redundancy to the maximum extent possible so reducing the need for compulsory redundancies. There would also be a three month notice period for voluntary and compulsory redundancies.


    2) In order to improve the position for lower paid civil servants, there would now be a floor of £23,000, in terms of the salary on which compensation would be based. In other words, anyone earning less than £23,000 (on a full-time equivalent basis) would be treated, for the purposes of calculating their redundancy payment, as if they were earning that figure.


    3) Staff earning more than six times the Private Sector Median Average Earnings (currently £149, 820) would have their salary capped at this figure for the purposes of calculating their redundancy payment.


    4) Staff who have reached minimum pension age may be able to have access to an unreduced pension if they depart on voluntary terms.

    the audit commission is not part of the civil service though, so presumably they are just entitled to statutory redundancy pay.
  • daveyjp
    daveyjp Posts: 14,180 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    The only bonfire will be from all the stationery which is no longer required.

    Lots of merging, lots of restructures, lots of new posts for staff.

    Savings? We'll never know.
  • Looks to me that health & environmental health has took the major hits
    Not Again
  • Oooooo & they can now appoint whoever they want to whatever post without recourse.
    Not Again
  • lemonjelly
    lemonjelly Posts: 8,014 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Combo Breaker Mortgage-free Glee!
    Looks to me that health & environmental health has took the major hits

    Quite ridiculous that they've kept the 3 horse racing quango's, but scrapped or merged pretty much all other sports quango's.

    No elitism there, or pandering to stereotypes eh?

    In addition, a lot of housing related quango's are going. How's that for being on topic?
    It's getting harder & harder to keep the government in the manner to which they have become accustomed.
  • BenL
    BenL Posts: 3,189 Forumite
    the audit commission is not part of the civil service though, so presumably they are just entitled to statutory redundancy pay.

    Although the audit commission were not mentioned directly there was a fella on radio5 this morning advising that some non civil service "departments" for want of a better word have civil service type employment contracts. They may still get the payouts.
    I beep for Robins - Beep Beep
    & Choo Choo for trains!!
  • lemonjelly wrote: »
    Quite ridiculous that they've kept the 3 horse racing quango's, but scrapped or merged pretty much all other sports quango's.


    Boris has got more power out of it....
    Not Again
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.6K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.5K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.5K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.5K Life & Family
  • 261.8K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.