csa penalty assessment

bazzer123

The csa penalty assessed me in 2005 when i was on benifits.The total is £3797.56 and when i was working back 2008 they asked my boss to take £265.32 a month witch he did i have the wage slips to porve it and the bank statements form 2005 to prove i was on benifits. Now they are going down the court road. they whant it all now and the money i have paid. They whant again as they say my ex boss did not send it. Any help would be grate. thanks.

speedster

you're not alone. a boss has recently been jailed for failing to hand the money over from a DEO he took from an employees wages. the only legal recourse would be to sue your old boss.

the bad news is, that as far as the nazis at ze csa are concerned, they haven't had the money from you, so in their infinite wisdom they will continue to chase you for it.

the best advice i can give you is to get your MP on to the case. also, NACSA are ace at sorting out csa messes as they know more about the csa laws than the morons that work there.

i think it's £50 membership, but worth every penny and more as they tak over for you. a must if you don't know the system if you have them buzztards hounding you.

DUTR

bazzer123 wrote: »

The csa penalty assessed me in 2005 when i was on benifits.The total is £3797.56 and when i was working back 2008 they asked my boss to take £265.32 a month witch he did i have the wage slips to porve it and the bank statements form 2005 to prove i was on benifits. Now they are going down the court road. they whant it all now and the money i have paid. They whant again as they say my ex boss did not send it. Any help would be grate. thanks.

How can you furnish wage slips if you are on benefits?
So then you are on benefits and somehow obtained some massive arrears (incidently about 1 year of wage slips worth) ?
You are supposed to inform the CSA of change of circumstance (if you did I would get someone else to check the forms and letter before you send them off, as there are a lot of errors in your grammer etc) . If the csa agents are reputed to be not bright , how can you expect them to decipher what you post?
Good luck

shell_542

DUTR wrote: »

How can you furnish wage slips if you are on benefits?
So then you are on benefits and somehow obtained some massive arrears (incidently about 1 year of wage slips worth) ?
You are supposed to inform the CSA of change of circumstance (if you did I would get someone else to check the forms and letter before you send them off, as there are a lot of errors in your grammer etc) . If the csa agents are reputed to be not bright , how can you expect them to decipher what you post?
Good luck

On benefits in 2005 and working in 2008. Not too hard to understand.

DUTR

shell_542 wrote: »

On benefits in 2005 and working in 2008. Not too hard to understand.

Indeed, which incorparates a CoC, which appears to be omitted somewhere in the story.
I'm just inviting the OP to clarify the story, as whilst some say I'm anti PWC, this does seem a case of an NRP trying to blag the system, hopefully I'm incorrect

bazzer123

DUTR wrote: »

How can you furnish wage slips if you are on benefits?
So then you are on benefits and somehow obtained some massive arrears (incidently about 1 year of wage slips worth) ?
You are supposed to inform the CSA of change of circumstance (if you did I would get someone else to check the forms and letter before you send them off, as there are a lot of errors in your grammer etc) . If the csa agents are reputed to be not bright , how can you expect them to decipher what you post?
Good luck

two time frames 2005 and 2008 on benifits in2005 working in2008

DUTR

bazzer123 wrote: »

two time frames 2005 and 2008 on benifits in2005 working in2008

So do you agree that you owe some child support financial contribution for 2008?
All the NRPs I know get an annual statement, so I'm still confused why you never noticed that the statement was not showing that the csa were not in reciept of your contrbution.
Perhaps a case via Nacsa may be worth consideration.

bazzer123

DUTR wrote: »

So do you agree that you owe some child support financial contribution for 2008?
All the NRPs I know get an annual statement, so I'm still confused why you never noticed that the statement was not showing that the csa were not in reciept of your contrbution.
Perhaps a case via Nacsa may be worth consideration.

yes in2008 the csa stoped talking to me after they had asked my boss for the payments because i was not happy with having to pay for the penilty in2005 when i was getting £56 to live on they whanted £146.35 a week and it has taken 5 years for them to tell me about it.

bdt1

bazzer123 wrote: »

yes in2008 the csa stoped talking to me after they had asked my boss for the payments because i was not happy with having to pay for the penilty in2005 when i was getting £56 to live on they whanted £146.35 a week and it has taken 5 years for them to tell me about it.

Ok , 1st things 1st, if you had a penalty assessment made in 2005, wherey CSA wanted/assessed that you pay £146.35 per week, yet you were on benefits and only had an income of £56 per week, what I advise you do, is request in writing (recorded delivery of course) that the Interim Maintenance Assessment made in 2005, be converted to a Full Maintenance Assessment, you will need to ask them what specific information they require to convert this penalty assessment (IMA) to a Full Maintenance Assessment.

They should tell you exactly what they need, you provide it, and then they will either convert the IMA to a FMA, or refuse. If they convert to FMA, great, the penalties will be removed, thus a lesser assessment (probably approx £5 per week, whilst you were on benefits), if they refuse this gives you appeal rights, and you can then demand an Independent Appeal Tribunal whereby everything will be heard by an Independent Judge, who will make a decision

Good luck

bdt1

Also, complain (in writing recorded delivery), involve NACSA, and MP as others have advised with regard to proof you have that employer must have failed to hand over CSA monies that were taken at source from your wages

shell_542

DUTR wrote: »

Indeed, which incorparates a CoC, which appears to be omitted somewhere in the story.
I'm just inviting the OP to clarify the story, as whilst some say I'm anti PWC, this does seem a case of an NRP trying to blag the system, hopefully I'm incorrect

I just think you're not reading it properly. How would the OP have a DOE set up, with proof by way of pay slips, if he had never informed them of a COC.

It sounds more like an error by the CSA or his ex employer than a dodgy NRP to me.

You've had some good advice from BDT1, OP.