We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Number of First Time Buyers Down

First-time buyers hit new low amid house price fears

The proportion of first-time buyers is at its lowest level since the beginning of the credit crisis, leading to renewed warnings about a second dip in house prices

The share of the market occupied by first-time buyers dropped to 34 per cent in July, down from 38 per cent the previous month and the lowest proportion since August 2007, according to the latest mortgage statistics from the Council of Mortgage Lenders.

With first time buyers acting as a prop to the housing market, their decline numbers has led to economists concerns about a further drop in house prices.






First-time buyers are struggling to get on the property ladder as banks further tighten lending criteria.
These buyers have a typical deposit of 24 per cent of the value of their home, up from 21 per cent in April.
The number of loans approved to those buying a new home rose to 56,000 in July, up from 52,000 in June - but this remains significantly below long term averages.
Howard Archer, of economists Global Insight, said: “This mortgage data for July remains very low compared to long-term norms and does little to dilute suspicion that house prices will remain under pressure.
“It is also notable that mortgage approvals to first time buyers actually weakened in July, which suggests not only that they may be becoming more reluctant to move into the housing market in the current uncertain economic environment. It also suggests that first time buyers are finding it hard to get mortgages.”
Nicholas Leeming, of property website Zoopla.co.uk, said: “A crucial indicator of the health of the housing market is activity by first time buyers. The lack of attractive mortgage deals, combined with uncertainty around the economic impact of the government’s spending cuts affecting both lenders and borrowers, is seeing many frustrated first-time-buyers opt for renting in the short term.
"The mortgage market remains dominated by the cash-rich, with deposits on new homes increasing once again this month

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/economics/houseprices/7999619/First-time-buyers-hit-new-low-amid-house-price-fears.html
«1

Comments

  • chucky
    chucky Posts: 15,170 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    doire wrote: »
    sorry to disappoint doire but is as bad as you're trying to make it look like... the percentage look pretty average to me compared to the last few years...
    Quarters First time buyers as a percentage of total loans for a house purchase 
     
    Q1 2008 38% 
     
    Q4 2007 36% 
    Q3 2007 34% 
    Q2 2007 35% 
    Q1 2007 36% 
     
    Q4 2006 35% 
    Q3 2006 35% 
    Q2 2006 36% 
    Q1 2006 38% 
     
    Q4 2005 38% 
    Q3 2005 38% 
    Q2 2005 39% 
    Q1 2005 30% 
     
    Q4 2004 30% 
    Q3 2004 28% 
    Q2 2004 28% 
    Q1 2004 30% 
     
    Q4 2003 28% 
    Q3 2003 28% 
    Q2 2003 31% 
    Q1 2003 33% 
     
    Q4 2002 39% 
    Q3 2002 38% 
    Q2 2002 37% 
    Q1 2002 40% 
     
    Q4 2001 43% 
    Q3 2001 44% 
    Q2 2001 42% 
    Q1 2001 44% 
     
    Q4 2000 43% 
    Q3 2000 43% 
    Q2 2000 44% 
    Q1 2000 49% 
    
  • I'm seeing this trend more and more - papers printing doom and gloom to try and prop up falling sales as the number of people buying news falls due to the internet, meanwhile the figures confirm the exact opposite is true.
  • System
    System Posts: 178,376 Community Admin
    10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    What happened in 2003/4?
    This is a system account and does not represent a real person. To contact the Forum Team email forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com
  • Thrugelmir
    Thrugelmir Posts: 89,546 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    chucky wrote: »
    sorry to disappoint doire but is as bad as you're trying to make it look like... the percentage look pretty average to me compared to the last few years...
    Quarters First time buyers as a percentage of total loans for a house purchase 
     
    Q1 2008 38% 
     
    Q4 2007 36% 
    Q3 2007 34% 
    Q2 2007 35% 
    Q1 2007 36% 
     
    Q4 2006 35% 
    Q3 2006 35% 
    Q2 2006 36% 
    Q1 2006 38% 
     
    Q4 2005 38% 
    Q3 2005 38% 
    Q2 2005 39% 
    Q1 2005 30% 
     
    Q4 2004 30% 
    Q3 2004 28% 
    Q2 2004 28% 
    Q1 2004 30% 
     
    Q4 2003 28% 
    Q3 2003 28% 
    Q2 2003 31% 
    Q1 2003 33% 
     
    Q4 2002 39% 
    Q3 2002 38% 
    Q2 2002 37% 
    Q1 2002 40% 
     
    Q4 2001 43% 
    Q3 2001 44% 
    Q2 2001 42% 
    Q1 2001 44% 
     
    Q4 2000 43% 
    Q3 2000 43% 
    Q2 2000 44% 
    Q1 2000 49% 
    

    Noticable how the number of FTB's picked up in 2003, and into 2004, once the lenders tapped into the wholesale money markets. Then progressively dropped away again. As even the availibity of easy credit was insufficent in light of the rising market.
  • Chris2685
    Chris2685 Posts: 1,212 Forumite
    chucky wrote: »
    sorry to disappoint doire but is as bad as you're trying to make it look like... the percentage look pretty average to me compared to the last few years...
    Quarters First time buyers as a percentage of total loans for a house purchase 
     
    Q1 2008 38% 
     
    Q4 2007 36% 
    Q3 2007 34% 
    Q2 2007 35% 
    Q1 2007 36% 
     
    Q4 2006 35% 
    Q3 2006 35% 
    Q2 2006 36% 
    Q1 2006 38% 
     
    Q4 2005 38% 
    Q3 2005 38% 
    Q2 2005 39% 
    Q1 2005 30% 
     
    Q4 2004 30% 
    Q3 2004 28% 
    Q2 2004 28% 
    Q1 2004 30% 
     
    Q4 2003 28% 
    Q3 2003 28% 
    Q2 2003 31% 
    Q1 2003 33% 
     
    Q4 2002 39% 
    Q3 2002 38% 
    Q2 2002 37% 
    Q1 2002 40% 
     
    Q4 2001 43% 
    Q3 2001 44% 
    Q2 2001 42% 
    Q1 2001 44% 
     
    Q4 2000 43% 
    Q3 2000 43% 
    Q2 2000 44% 
    Q1 2000 49% 
    


    Source please?
  • Graham_Devon
    Graham_Devon Posts: 58,560 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    chucky wrote: »
    sorry to disappoint doire but is as bad as you're trying to make it look like... the percentage look pretty average to me compared to the last few years...

    It's comparing it to last month, not quarter on quarter. Your figures also take into consideration those classed at FTB's who are not, just have been out of the market for over 6 months.

    Other thing is, it wasn't doire who wrote the article as far as I'm aware.
  • ILW
    ILW Posts: 18,333 Forumite
    Chris2685 wrote: »
    Source please?

    Red or Brown?
  • chucky
    chucky Posts: 15,170 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    edited 13 September 2010 at 2:23PM
    It's comparing it to last month, not quarter on quarter. Your figures also take into consideration those classed at FTB's who are not, just have been out of the market for over 6 months.
    no, you missed the point - the article says it was the lowest since August 2007.

    i've provided additional data to prove that it's been down to 28% in the past which is much lower than the 36% claimed in the article.

    things can't be that bad then...

    btw do you think month on month or quarter on quarter would show the percentages any differently? you obviously don't understand how statistics work.
  • chucky
    chucky Posts: 15,170 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Chris2685 wrote: »
    Source please?
    ironically it's from the most perfect source www.hpc.co.uk
    i wonder why they stopped producing the numbers after 2008.

    http://www.housepricecrash.co.uk/graphs-ftb-percentage.php
  • Chris2685
    Chris2685 Posts: 1,212 Forumite
    Thanks chucky,

    Looks like the source for their data was http://www.cml.org.uk

    Unfortunately you need to sign up to get the full data (and I presume the FTB data).

    This was an interesting one to look at though, but really unrelated to this thread:
    http://www.cml.org.uk/cml/filegrab/Grossmortgagelendingtable-July2010.xls?ref=7315

    This one tells you a little about FTB data, but not much: http://www.cml.org.uk/cml/media/press/2682
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 601K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259.1K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.