We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Changes to Housing benefit how much will rents fall?

1404143454661

Comments

  • Councils to move LHA claimants out of London

    http://www.insidehousing.co.uk/news/housing-management/councils-to-move-lha-claimants-out-of-london/6512167.article

    The worst part is-

    Families with children would be forced to remove them from school, and those claiming housing benefit as an in-work benefit would lose their jobs as a result of moving so far away, Mr Minto warned.
  • ukcarper
    ukcarper Posts: 17,337 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Exactly, they will have to move far away to rent somewhere so that they can keep a sizable portion of their 500 per week to live on.

    Take neverdispairgirl for example-




    So her rent alone is more than total ben cap.

    If her family were on low earnings they would have to move far away from London. If they stayed in London but moved to a cheaper area they would have hardly anything left from the 500 to live on.

    It will not take long for families in this position to work out that if they moved to Wales or somewhere then they would be able to have more of their 500wk for living on instead of most of it going to rent and council tax.

    I think you will find that not many will move that far if they can still survive where they are.
  • If her family were on low earnings they would have to move far away from London. If they stayed in London but moved to a cheaper area they would have hardly anything left from the 500 to live on.

    It will not take long for families in this position to work out that if they moved to Wales or somewhere then they would be able to have more of their 500wk for living on instead of most of it going to rent and council tax.

    Shame the job would have to go though..

    :silenced:
    It all seems so stupid it makes me want to give up.
    But why should I give up, when it all seems so stupid ?
  • RDB
    RDB Posts: 872 Forumite
    Shame the job would have to go though..

    :silenced:

    It is a shame many people will have to leave employment in London and become unemployed in cheaper area. But if they can not pay their own way living in London, then to be unemployed in Wales is costing the country less than paying their high London rents and council tax.

    Councils to move LHA claimants out of London

    http://www.insidehousing.co.uk/news/housing-management/councils-to-move-lha-claimants-out-of-london/6512167.article

    The worst part is-

    Families with children would be forced to remove them from school, and those claiming housing benefit as an in-work benefit would lose their jobs as a result of moving so far away, Mr Minto warned.


    Leaving your job to be unemployed is one thing, but I feel sorry for the kids who will have to start again in new school in cheap areas.
  • olly300
    olly300 Posts: 14,738 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    A family with 3 children or less wouldn't actually have to move out of London to Wales they would need to move to an outer London Borough like Croydon, Hillingdon or Barking and Dagenham.

    A couple with a child under 5 could live in a one bedroom flat. Flats can be found in Croydon for £550pcm. If the child was older than 5 years a 2 bedroom flat could be found for £650pcm.

    I've met families in council properties living in one bedroom flats with more than one child under 5.

    Moving to an outer London borough would mean they could still have family and friends visit them but if either of the couple were working in inner London i.e. zones 1 and 2 they wouldn't be able to afford the peak hour transport costs of the train to get to work so would lose their job.
    I'm not cynical I'm realistic :p

    (If a link I give opens pop ups I won't know I don't use windows)
  • Yoshua
    Yoshua Posts: 298 Forumite
    olly300 wrote: »
    A family with 3 children or less wouldn't actually have to move out of London to Wales they would need to move to an outer London Borough like Croydon, Hillingdon or Barking and Dagenham.

    A couple with a child under 5 could live in a one bedroom flat. Flats can be found in Croydon for £550pcm. If the child was older than 5 years a 2 bedroom flat could be found for £650pcm.

    I've met families in council properties living in one bedroom flats with more than one child under 5.

    Moving to an outer London borough would mean they could still have family and friends visit them but if either of the couple were working in inner London i.e. zones 1 and 2 they wouldn't be able to afford the peak hour transport costs of the train to get to work so would lose their job.



    Where do you get the 5yr old thing from? Im not saying you are wrong its just I thought it was 10yr old that made a difference.

    A couple with 2 kids under 10yrs old would only qualify for a 2 bed. If they are different sexes and one is older than 10yrs then they qualify for 3 bedroom property.

    I just do not think you can find a good 3 bed property in London cheap enough.

    If this family want to keep the maximum amount of disposable cash to live on out of their £500 benefit cap, then they will have to move away.


    This is the point that most do not get, including the commentators who have written those articles.
    The £500 total benefits cap will mean most claimants (who are not as dumb as many think) will soon see that if they live in London they will not be able to keep much of their working/child tax credits.

    If they move away from London they will be rewarded with more spending cash every week.

    Surely no one would choose to stay in London and use up most of their £500 per week on rent and council tax benefit.

    They will choose to move, especially with that £20,000,000 fund available to pay for removal companies to do it all for them.
  • Jowo_2
    Jowo_2 Posts: 8,308 Forumite
    ..Families with children would be forced to remove them from school, and those claiming housing benefit as an in-work benefit would lose their jobs as a result of moving so far away, Mr Minto warned.

    To play devil's advocate, those seeking employment opportunities often have to move location to take advantage of them, which means a change of school for their children.

    Someone serving in the Armed Forces can uproot their kids every 2 to 3 years. So too for Vicars and other types of employment where regular moves are the norm.

    If the claimants are working and claiming LHA, then they can choose a location away from central London, for example, with transport links to their employer, such as being on a good train, tube, tram or bus route.

    Watford, for example, is about 20 mins by train or 30 mins by tube into central London. Reading about 25 minutes to Paddington.
  • ukcarper
    ukcarper Posts: 17,337 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Jowo wrote: »
    To play devil's advocate, those seeking employment opportunities often have to move location to take advantage of them, which means a change of school for their children.

    Someone serving in the Armed Forces can uproot their kids every 2 to 3 years. So too for Vicars and other types of employment where regular moves are the norm.

    If the claimants are working and claiming LHA, then they can choose a location away from central London, for example, with transport links to their employer, such as being on a good train, tube, tram or bus route.

    Watford, for example, is about 20 mins by train or 30 mins by tube into central London. Reading about 25 minutes to Paddington.


    A season ticket from Reading is about £3400 per year or £283 a month a lot of money for someone claiming LHA and that’s assuming they can find £3400 up front a weekly ticket is £85.
  • RDB
    RDB Posts: 872 Forumite
    Jowo wrote: »
    To play devil's advocate, those seeking employment opportunities often have to move location to take advantage of them, which means a change of school for their children.

    Someone serving in the Armed Forces can uproot their kids every 2 to 3 years. So too for Vicars and other types of employment where regular moves are the norm.

    If the claimants are working and claiming LHA, then they can choose a location away from central London, for example, with transport links to their employer, such as being on a good train, tube, tram or bus route.

    Watford, for example, is about 20 mins by train or 30 mins by tube into central London. Reading about 25 minutes to Paddington.



    As someone said peak time travel costs are very expensive into London if they are only earning min wage.
  • Jowo_2
    Jowo_2 Posts: 8,308 Forumite
    ukcarper wrote: »
    A season ticket from Reading is about £3400 per year or £283 a month a lot of money for someone claiming LHA and that’s assuming they can find £3400 up front a weekly ticket is £85.

    Good point but Reading also has good job opportunities and Watford's not exactly on it's knees.

    A weekly bus ticket works out around £12 per week which isn't particularly extortionate. This bus will get a person into central London from Peckham in 30 mins.

    A person in employment reduces their expenses and maximises their income to live within their means, whether it means working longer hours, finding a job closer to their home, taking the bus instead of the train, and so on.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 258.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.