We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Why were house prices cheaper in the 1970s than they are in the C21st?
Comments
-
But in the 70s most people could buy with one income.
Ever feel like you've been played McTittish?"The problem with quotes on the internet is that you never know whether they are genuine or not" -
Albert Einstein0 -
HAMISH_MCTAVISH wrote: »House prices were cheaper in the 70's.
The percentage of income required to buy a house, including mortgage interest, was higher in the 70's.
It was less affordable to buy a house in the 70's than today.
So simple, surely even Mrs T can understand it.
Ignore the one income aspect....ignore the one income aspect.....ignore the one income aspect.
Sorry, I thought it was getting repetative0 -
I have not read this thread, nor will I.
There are many reasons why HP are more expensive.
It is down to the education and developement of the BRIC's nations, the development of the internet and our mobility.
Most of you will rave on about interest rates etc being low, but with out the above, none of it would have happened.0 -
But in the 70s most people could buy with one income.
In the 70's, most people couldn't buy at all.“The great enemy of the truth is very often not the lie – deliberate, contrived, and dishonest – but the myth, persistent, persuasive, and unrealistic.
Belief in myths allows the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought.”
-- President John F. Kennedy”0 -
Sorry but this is a silly argument unless you take the social conditions into account.
Houses were in cash terms cheaper BUT:- pay was lower in real terms - less disposable income to pay mortgages.
- Families were mainly single income. There was much less possibility of women earning good wages. It was less acceptable for mothers to hold down full time jobs, they couldnt have got the child care anyway.
- Much larger numbers of people were living permanently in rented accommodation, mainly council housing. Many did not see themselves as potential home owners, and to be honest they werent.
So nothing much has changed, except perhaps expectations. There are many more pople now who see themselves as potential home owners and are therefore frustrated when the realities of supply and demand prevent them buying.
Is this better or worse then simply not having the option?0 -
Were womens wages even allowed to be counted towards mortgages in the 70's? I can remember my mum saying her income was not counted when buying their home because it was 'normal' for a woman to stop working to raise a family.MF aim 10th December 2020 :j:eek:MFW 2012 no86 OP 0/20000
-
LilacPixie wrote: »Were womens wages even allowed to be counted towards mortgages in the 70's? I can remember my mum saying her income was not counted when buying their home because it was 'normal' for a woman to stop working to raise a family.
there were but generally only 1x0 -
Mortgages were rationed so many couldn't buy despite being able to afford the repaymentsLilacPixie wrote: »Were womens wages even allowed to be counted towards mortgages in the 70's? I can remember my mum saying her income was not counted when buying their home because it was 'normal' for a woman to stop working to raise a family.
ukcarper is right and so was the person who reminded us that you had to endure an interview with a building society manager before being 'granted' a mortgage.
There was no question of someone 'selling you a product' back then. It was as if they were doing you a very considerable favour.0 -
HAMISH_MCTAVISH wrote: »In the 70's, most people couldn't buy at all.
Couldn't or wouldn't?
You forget that in the 70's - long before the era of property !!!!!! shows on the TV - most people had no need to buy. Rents were controlled, tenants had security of tenure, council houses were still being built and were widely available and this was long, long before the era of right-to-buy.
Today's assumptions that everyone wished to buy, or if they couldn't were 'frustrated' in some way, are terribly anachronistic.
Far fewer people bought partly because far fewer people wanted/needed to buy.
And we all know what impact lower demand has on prices...0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 258.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards