We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Interest rates 'may hit 8pc' in two years
Comments
-
HAMISH_MCTAVISH wrote: »The 300 year plus historical average interest rate is around 4.9%.
The rates of the 70's, 80's and 90's were the highest interest rates in history, and were abnormal.
The rates of the last decade, of around 5%, are very much the historical "normal".
Which is 10 times what some people seem to have got used to!0 -
Which is 10 times what some people seem to have got used to!
The interest rate thing is a weird one. Yes, there's a minority of people on trackers who are on an interest rate 'ten times' less than 5%, but not very many.
Most SVRs are about 4.5% or so? So anyone on an SVR isn't on very low rates.
If you're one of the feew getting one of the current tracker mortgages that are around 2.5% then it suggests that you've done something right in the past with your money as you'd need a pretty decent deposit.
As I've said before, we took out a five year fixed at 4.74% in early 2004. We then went on to SVR in 2009 which was around 4%, then we've just fixed for around 4% for the next five years until around 2015. I suspect that many people will be similar to us, in that they've not really seen much difference in their mortgage rates for the past 6 or 7 years, and might not see much of a difference for the next 6 or 7.0 -
The interest rate thing is a weird one. Yes, there's a minority of people on trackers who are on an interest rate 'ten times' less than 5%, but not very many.
Most SVRs are about 4.5% or so? So anyone on an SVR isn't on very low rates.
If you're one of the feew getting one of the current tracker mortgages that are around 2.5% then it suggests that you've done something right in the past with your money as you'd need a pretty decent deposit.
As I've said before, we took out a five year fixed at 4.74% in early 2004. We then went on to SVR in 2008 which was around 4%, then we've just fixed for around 4% for the next five years until around 2010. I suspect that many people will be similar to us, in that they've not really seen much difference in their mortgage rates for the past 6 or 7 years, and might not see much of a difference for the next 6 or 7.
I can only give my experience.
Fix at 4.75%, which after fix went up to 7.75% and now it's down to 3.75%.0 -
Interest rates should be at 8% now. The sooner they rise, the better.0
-
So you think the base rate being at 8% would generally be a good thing for our economy right now?
Yes, because savers would at least be able to get an inflation beating return on their investment, feel wealthier and be able to spend more without worrying about their future as much.0 -
So you think the base rate being at 8% would generally be a good thing for our economy right now?
If a substantial part of the defecit is paid down over the next 12-18 months, then higher rates may be a good thing for long term stability and an encouragement to save for emergencies, rather than spending more than one earns and then banging it on credit at every little hiccup. This goes for governments and individuals.0 -
If a substantial part of the defecit is paid down over the next 12-18 months, then higher rates may be a good thing for long term stability and an encouragement to save for emergencies rather than spending more than one earns and then banging it on credit at every little hiccup. This goes for governments and individuals.
I completely agree. What I completely don't agree with is interest rates being moved to 8% now, which is a stupid suggestion.0 -
Yes, because savers would at least be able to get an inflation beating return on their investment, feel wealthier and be able to spend more without worrying about their future as much.
I asked you whether you thought it would be good for the wider, whole economy though. You've answered in relation to savers.
By the way, savers don't make investments, savers save their money (which is where they get their name from I believe). Investors invest their money, and many will have got a return well over 8% over the past year or so.0 -
I will always vote labour and they were hardly trashed at the recent election, were they?
Ah, but it's because Labour became the party of people like you that I stopped voting Labour.
Read a Grauniad article on holiday saying (IIRC) that research showed that Labour lost 6 times as many votes among 'traditional' Labour supporters as it did among the 'New Labour' supporters.
Someone with your approach to housing is clearly not Old Labour...0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards