Interest rates 'may hit 8pc' in two years

chucky

Graham_Devon wrote: »

You'd like me to ask again?

Shall we start again? No, I wont bother, just read page 7 and 8.

Chucky says:


That would suggest that because inflation happens, chucky see's enough wage inflation not only to keep up with general inflation, but also to push house prices up.

Now, it doesn't take a genius to work out that thats a helluva lot of wage inflation chucky is talking about.

i can't believe that you're still twisting and still trying to spin yourself out of the muddle you've put yourself in.

and to be clear i didn't say there would be "enough wage inflation not only to keep up with general inflation, but also to push house prices up." you're lying and you've made that up.

i said there could be enough wage inflation for nominal rises that are less than inflation - Post 157 shows how you can nominal HPI with real house price fals with wage inflation.

stop lying and just admit you where wrong.

i can't believe you didn't know what wage inflation was pmsl

Graham_Devon

Really2 wrote: »

I still stick by I don't know

Wow, would never have guessed

Clear enough for you.

Yups.

Graham_Devon

[QUOTE=chucky;35982969
and to be clear i didn't say there would be "enough wage inflation not only to keep up with general inflation, but also to push house prices up." you're lying and you've made that up.[/QUOTE]

I know you didn't say it.

If you had, we wouldn't have had 2 pages of the same question asking if thats what your suggesting, genius boy

Really2

Graham_Devon wrote: »

Wow, would never have guessed



Yups.

I answered
So Graham, your take????????????????????????????????????????


I won't wait.

chucky

Graham_Devon wrote: »

I know you didn't say it.

If you had, we wouldn't have had 2 pages of the same question asking if thats what your suggesting, genius boy

so you've been arguing for the last 8 pages when you haven't got a clue what wage inflation is - typical :rotfl:

Really2

chucky wrote: »

when you haven't got a clue what wage inflation is - typical :rotfl:

TBF he has got a foot pump ready for it.

Graham_Devon

Really2 wrote: »

I answered you pretentious cretin.

So Graham, your take????????????????????????????????????????


I won't wait.

Hey now, calm down. You've answered, I've accepted your answer. Job done.

My take? Wage inflation won't keep up with the pace of general inflation.

Could be right could be wrong. But I don't see companies ready to pay out massive wage rises right now, or indeed, anywhere in the near future. Simple.

Exocet

OK guys, you have had some fun. Now this is a snippet about inflation which may help.

Chaotic Inflation, proposed by physicist Andrei Linde, models our universe as one of many that grew as part of a multiverse owing to a vacuum that had not decayed to its ground state. In this theory, the peaks in the evolution of a scalar field (determining the energy of the vacuum) correspond to regions of rapid inflation which dominate, creating "bubble universes," making the structure of space fractal on the very largest scales, likely at scales larger than the observable universe. Chaotic Inflation (along with some other types of inflation) is usually a sub-class of eternal inflation, since the expansion of the inflationary peaks exhibit positive feedback and come to dominate the large scale dynamics of the universe.

I hope it helps.






Means f'ck all to me.

Really2

Graham_Devon wrote: »

Could be right could be wrong. But I don't see companies ready to pay out massive wage rises right now, or indeed, anywhere in the near future. Simple.

Neither do I.

But you kind of miss the point of the article when you say that. It is based on a QE lead boom causing inflation.
If companies don't inflate wages the situation won't happen.

chucky

Graham_Devon wrote: »

Hey now, calm down. You've answered, I've accepted your answer. Job done.

My take? Wage inflation won't keep up with the pace of general inflation.

Could be right could be wrong. But I don't see companies ready to pay out massive wage rises right now, or indeed, anywhere in the near future. Simple.

that's my take too.

the article thinks otherwise though...

and so it begins...