We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Renters: Angry and Insecure
Comments
-
Sounds like your usual demand and supply argument. Suppose they could just up the interest rates though.HAMISH_MCTAVISH wrote: »My definition of rationing is that banks only have a third of the funding to lend that they had previously.
As with anything in short supply, they must find a way to ration it.
In this case, by increasing deposit requirements until the pool of borrowers matches the available funding.0 -
mortgage "rationing" :rotfl:0
-
That bird with two kids might marry some bloke and get out of the pit.
That other example is a second class citizen. He's spot on with his analysis.
He's renting a house with two kids and has got his missus up the duff again. He was in no position to bring a child into the world.
Giving him a house won't make things better. The blokes a loser. Bung him in a council house in Mether Tidvale and chuck away the keys.
NEXT....We love Sarah O Grady0 -
Angry and Insecure?
I'm a renter and I'd describe myself as content but sleepy.0 -
where did i back up hamish on this thread?*yawn* chucky backing up Hamish again
go on, i bet you can't find it and you're making it up...
don't be shy - show me Mr Soundbite
it was sarcasm - i didn't for one moment expect any intelligence or even counter argument from you. get it now?Who said i wanted to post a counter arugement?0 -
where did i back up hamish on this thread?
go on, i bet you can't find it and you're making it up...
don't be shy - show me Mr Soundbite
it was sarcasm - i didn't for one moment expect any intelligence or even counter argument from you. get it now?
Do you rent? You seem very angry lol0 -
HAMISH_MCTAVISH wrote: »If it weren't for the abnormally high deposit requirements...
Another viewpoint is that deposits have returned to historic norms.
In Australia where there really hasn't been much of a banking crisis you need 5% deposit and will have to take out an MIG if borrowing > 80%.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 353.7K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.2K Spending & Discounts
- 246.8K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.2K Life & Family
- 260.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards