We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Having a private pension is NOT a good idea.

13

Comments

  • lvader
    lvader Posts: 2,579 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    maureen_04 wrote: »
    I receive I.S, I.B, DLA & my husband gets carers allowance.

    He is 57 and is considering taking his small pension early. The pension will be around £70 per month, plus a £6k lump sum, which is actually the reason for the decision.

    Am I right in thinking that my I.S. will reduce by the amount of the pension, I get £54 per fortnight I.S, so will still be entitled to a reduced amount thus still being entitled to housing benefit etc.

    Will the lump sum affect my benefits in any way, we don't want to take the pension early if it makes us worse off.

    Any advice would be appreciated. Thanks!

    You and your sister in law have a lot in common.
  • Turnbull2000
    Turnbull2000 Posts: 1,807 Forumite
    BTL and don't declare the income seems to be the way to go.
    Hi, we’ve had to remove your signature. If you’re not sure why please read the forum rules or email the forum team if you’re still unsure - MSE ForumTeam
  • dunstonh
    dunstonh Posts: 121,241 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    BTL and don't declare the income seems to be the way to go.

    HMRC are only about 4 years behind on catching up on non-declarers at the moment. A lot of newbie landlords have been getting caught out and not only have to pay the back tax but also a penalty on top which can be as much as double again.
    I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.
  • Baz_2
    Baz_2 Posts: 729 Forumite
    bendix wrote: »
    Benefits are there to support those who CAN'T take care of themselves. This lady can. She did. Well done.

    You can't have both, though.

    I don't know what you're moaning about, precisely. There is no crappy outcome - she is supporting herself. That she loses some money is a damning indictment of there being far too many benefits for peoples' own good. That her relative (the OP) is complaining is a damning indictment that some people think it is far better to let other people take care of you, rather than taking responsibility for doing it oneself.

    You missed the bit where she said she is £300 worse off and that she cannot afford to live now?

    Surely losing £300 per month is a crappy outcome, how can it not be. Crappy benefits system and crappy outcome saving for years and not having any benefit for it, whats the point? Seriously there's no motivation for anyone on this level of income to save into a pension when the result can be you get less income not more because of it. Its ok for you though with your big premiums and large retirement pot that will take you well over the level of pension credit etc etc....

    As for patronising, you are very definition of patronising.
  • bendix
    bendix Posts: 5,499 Forumite
    Baz wrote: »
    You missed the bit where she said she is £300 worse off and that she cannot afford to live now?

    Surely losing £300 per month is a crappy outcome, how can it not be. Crappy benefits system and crappy outcome saving for years and not having any benefit for it, whats the point? Seriously there's no motivation for anyone on this level of income to save into a pension when the result can be you get less income not more because of it. Its ok for you though with your big premiums and large retirement pot that will take you well over the level of pension credit etc etc....

    As for patronising, you are very definition of patronising.

    You forget one key point. The benefits that she is benefiting from now won't be available in the future.

    End of discussion.
  • notyet
    notyet Posts: 49 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10 Posts Combo Breaker
    Firstly, may i congratulate the lady in question for having done the wise option and saved for her retirement?
    Secondly, I have a BIG problem with the statement made.... she claimed DLA and IB? My mother was disabled and my father her full time carer. When the Benefits Agency (as it was then) representative reviewed the situation, they told my mum she could only receive DLA, IS, Housing Benefit at 60% and Council Tax Benefit at 40% (due to working adults living in the same property.) Dad got nothing. My parent was not allowed to claim IB as well. It was one or the other. How long has she been claiming? Did she get a free car from the DLA? If she wasnt working, how could she afford to pay into a pension? Im wondering if the benefits were overpaid.
  • seven-day-weekend
    seven-day-weekend Posts: 36,755 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited 17 August 2010 at 11:20AM
    You are allowed to claim IB and DLA at the same time. One is if you are too sick to work and the other is if you have care and/or mobility needs because of a disability.

    However this may only apply if you are on Contributions-based IB. If you are on Income Support due to Incapacity, then it is means tested and the total household income (not the DLA ) is counted. Therefore you may not be eligible for any Income-related IB if your household income is already deemed high enough.

    You can only get a mobility car if you are on HIGH rate mobility DLA and also someone can only claim Carers' Allowance for you if you are on High or Medium rate Care DLA. But again, Carers' Allowance is means-tested so although they might be elegible for it, someone may not get it if the household income is too high

    Hoe this clarifies.
    (AKA HRH_MUngo)
    Member #10 of £2 savers club
    Imagine someone holding forth on biology whose only knowledge of the subject is the Book of British Birds, and you have a rough idea of what it feels like to read Richard Dawkins on theology: Terry Eagleton
  • margaretclare
    margaretclare Posts: 10,789 Forumite
    Correct me if I'm wrong but if I get £X in benefits then fall back on a pension and state pension which is lower than the £X i was getting as benefits then the benefit payment were to high? Seems odd that these benefits should allow people to live a life style that means losing the benefits makes you worse of?

    That's my view on the subject but I do not think that implying that one should not put money aside for the future as the state will pay a more generous income is wrong.

    How can anyone be certain that the state WILL pay a more generous income in the future?

    And why should 'the state' (i.e. the ordinary taxpayer) pay a more generous income to those who have made no provision of their own?
    [FONT=Times New Roman, serif]Æ[/FONT]r ic wisdom funde, [FONT=Times New Roman, serif]æ[/FONT]r wear[FONT=Times New Roman, serif]ð[/FONT] ic eald.
    Before I found wisdom, I became old.
  • bendix
    bendix Posts: 5,499 Forumite
    How can anyone be certain that the state WILL pay a more generous income in the future?

    And why should 'the state' (i.e. the ordinary taxpayer) pay a more generous income to those who have made no provision of their own?


    Precisely. Perhaps I've got this 'living' and 'being a grownup' thing all wrong. I was under the impression that there is a certain innate human pride to take care of ourselves. I didn't realise the default position was actually that we should instead sod everyone else, not bother to save or sacrifice, and let someone else take care of us in the future instead.

    Now that I've got that sorted out, i shall spend all my income on wine, women and song and let you suckers pay for my retirement instead. I thank you from the bottom of my heart.

    Jeez, and people have the temerity to call MY stand selfish?
  • I agree with you Bendix.

    However, we must be aware that having a small pension can make someone worse off in real terms than someone who does not have one at all, it happened to my m-i-l. She had worked all her life in a manual job and just did not have enough money to save for a large pension. So despite working for fifty years,(14-64) she ended up worse off then her sister who had never worked because she was not entitled to all the freebies :(

    But that is no reason not to try to save for your own retirement, nor to tell everyone else they are wrong to do so. We all have that responsibility, imho.
    (AKA HRH_MUngo)
    Member #10 of £2 savers club
    Imagine someone holding forth on biology whose only knowledge of the subject is the Book of British Birds, and you have a rough idea of what it feels like to read Richard Dawkins on theology: Terry Eagleton
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.4K Life & Family
  • 261.4K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.