We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Charging Order

Hi all,
Am wondering if anyone can advise on this. I have a charging order (well technically a charging restriction) on a property. I have been trying to sell it for nearly a year now and have been told repeatedly that it is worth less then the outstanding mortgage and so I will be taking a loss of it. I am resigned to this as I really just need to be rid of it as I can't afford the mortgage payments, council tax etc on it. I am now hoping to sell it at auction but am wondering whether I am obliged to inform the creditor with the charging restriction that it is being sold since the sale is not even going to cover the mortgage, let alone leave any left over for them.
Any advice much appreciated x

Comments

  • Hannah_10
    Hannah_10 Posts: 1,774 Forumite
    I'm not sure, hopefully someone clever will be along soon, however I would reckon that National Debtline would know if no one here is able to answer. They're on 0808 808 4000
    I refuse to be afraid of the big bad wolf, spiders, or debt collection agencies; one of them's not real and the other two are powerless without my fear.
    (Ok, one of them is powerless, spiders can be nasty.)


    As of the last count I have cleared
    [STRIKE]23.16%[/STRIKE] 22.49% of my debt. :(
  • RAS
    RAS Posts: 36,526 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    podperson, is this sole ownership or joint?
    If you've have not made a mistake, you've made nothing
  • podperson
    podperson Posts: 3,125 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary 1,000 Posts
    The property is in joint names and the charging order is just in my name so I am aware that they only have a charging restriction not an actual order.
    I've read though that with a restriction you still need to let them know the property has been sold, even though you are not forced to give them any money from the sale unless they try and claim it. I'm just wondering if this will still apply even if I know there isn't going to be anything spare on it?
  • RAS
    RAS Posts: 36,526 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    If you've have not made a mistake, you've made nothing
  • podperson
    podperson Posts: 3,125 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary 1,000 Posts
    I have read that thread before and is extremely useful! But the thread seems to be saying that on a charging restriction the creditor isn't entitled to any money from the sale of a property they have the restriction on but they still have to be informed of the sale. I'm just wondering they would still need to be informed if there is going to be no money as a result of the sale (or no spare money at least!)
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.3K Life & Family
  • 261.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.