We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
serving Section 21 - a few Q's
Comments
-
it sure did !! thanks
i just had a clawback letter from a local authority for a HUUGE amount of money... sighs.. more letter writing and research and hassle needed to justify why i should not pay it back...
sadly LHA clients do need more and more time to service their accounts ....0 -
That *is* a lousy start to your week..... is it not the case though that, if the T has been acting fraudulently, the LHA office cannot claw the LHA payments back from the LL unless they can show that the LL knew about changes in the Ts circs and failed to notify the LHA office?...i just had a clawback letter from a local authority for a HUUGE amount of money... sighs.. more letter writing and research and hassle needed to justify why i should not pay it back... .
0 -
That *is* a lousy start to your week..... is it not the case though that, if the T has been acting fraudulently, the LHA office cannot claw the LHA payments back from the LL unless they can show that the LL knew about changes in the Ts circs and failed to notify the LHA office?
In theory.....
In practice step one seems to be threaten the LL (whatever the facts) and leave it up to the LL to "prove" that they did all they could to check up on the T (not taking into account, of course, a private LL's limited powers and the strong T protection to which we are subject).0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.6K Life & Family
- 259.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards