We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Britons inject 3.2 bln stg in housing equity in Q1 - BoE
Comments
-
context = it equates to people paying back nearly 1% of the average mortgage per year if it's annualised. re-capitalise that and it shortens the mortgage term.
With around £1,200 billion outstanding in total mortgage debt. Equity of £12 billion per annum equates to .01% of total debt.
Not earth shattering !0 -
£3.2 billion repaid divided by £11.5 million mortgages = just over £1,000 annualised.Thrugelmir wrote: »With around £1,200 billion outstanding in total mortgage debt. Equity of £12 billion equates to .01% not 1%.
from your numbers £1,200 billion mortgage debt divided by 11.5 million mortgages = £104k average mortgage
£1000 divided by £104k is just under 1%
have i got that horribly wrong?
i'm happy to be told i have
0 -
-
The flip side of that coin is that if the best investment you can find with interest rates at 2-3% is paying down cheap debt then the economy is in a real mess!
I think we've seen enough examples of people who simply concentrate on reducing debt than understanding that they could not reduce the debt and earn more.
Reducing debt is the safe method, laid down by generations albeit not the most financially astute one.
I myself suffer from this.
I'm rapidly repaying my BTL properties.
I shouldn't do so given the tax and interest benefits, but I prefer to do so at present to lower my risk.
My goal is to be debt free and prior to that reducing the risk.
Maybe not the best policy for my ecenomic situation, but certainly not an indicator that it's in a real mess.:wall:
What we've got here is....... failure to communicate.
Some men you just can't reach.
:wall:0 -
IveSeenTheLight wrote: »I think we've seen enough examples of people who simply concentrate on reducing debt than understanding that they could not reduce the debt and earn more.
Reducing debt is the safe method, laid down by generations albeit not the most financially astute one.
Current situation is unique. Only those who have benefited from taking low rate trackers at the right time are winners. Plenty of others are paying over the odds on their borrowed money. Average SVR across all lenders is close to 5%. Not many investments give a guaranteed post tax return of above 5%, without a risk to capital .0 -
just taking this part - why is it different to any other time?Thrugelmir wrote: »Current situation is unique. Only those who have benefited from taking low rate trackers at the right time are winners. Plenty of others are paying over the odds on their borrowed money. Average SVR across all lenders is close to 5%. Not many investments give a guaranteed post tax return of above 5%, without a risk to capital .
in general investment return is less than debt repayments - if this were not the case (in general terms) everyone would be borrowing to invest.0 -
just taking this part - why is it different to any other time?
in general investment return is less than debt repayments - if this were not the case (in general terms) everyone would be borrowing to invest.
Pretty much everyone does, don't they? If you buy shares (or your pension scheme does on your behalf) then you are effectively taking on debt as pretty much every listed company has debt.0 -
just taking this part - why is it different to any other time?
in general investment return is less than debt repayments - if this were not the case (in general terms) everyone would be borrowing to invest.
My comment was in response to,Reducing debt is the safe method, laid down by generations albeit not the most financially astute one
Which suggested that leveraging to invest, provides a better return.0 -
those people that are repaying this debt would be those that have higher interest debt than their investment rate or people who anticipate rates increasing.
Thats the reason im paying down.
I could tie up the savings for 2 years and earn about 2% more than my mortgage rate, but I just cant be arsed, Id rather just get the thing paid before Merv unleashes the beast.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards