We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Saving for your retirement - a new approach

245

Comments

  • mbarge
    mbarge Posts: 30 Forumite
    It's not meant to. It's meant to protect you from the perceived volatility of the stock markets up to the time you want to cash your pension fund in if it's heavily invested in said markets

    So you agree!
  • mbarge
    mbarge Posts: 30 Forumite
    Hmm - with inflation over 20 years, I'm sure that works out to a lot less than the headline 12.31% it implies. Or is the "guaranteed pension" figure indexed against some PI index?

    I agree - no inflation protection. But then look at current Gilt yields (4.25% long term) - clearly the market's not too worried about inflation.
  • Paul_Herring
    Paul_Herring Posts: 7,484 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    The interest on current Gilt Yields are affected by the price of them. If the markets think inflation may be a problem, the markets start selling them cheaper so the yield rises.
    Conjugating the verb 'to be":
    -o I am humble -o You are attention seeking -o She is Nadine Dorries
  • mbarge
    mbarge Posts: 30 Forumite
    I'm 48 years old. I have a pension fund of £100,000 invested in equities. It's seems to have been worth £100,000 for some time now!

    I'm seriously considering taking half of it and using it to buy a fixed future pension. For my £50,000 I've been quoted a guaranteed pension of £5,864 that will start when I reach age 65.

    So whatever happens to the stock markets and annuity rates, I know that much is protected and guaranteed. Its not that I'm bearish about stock markets and think this will provide me with more pension its the risk that worries me. Currently my standard of living when I retire is dependent on how stock markets grow over the next 17 years and what happens to annuity rates (which also seem to be in a falling trend!).

    For someone who's cautious like me - is there any alternative?
  • zygurat789
    zygurat789 Posts: 4,263 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture Combo Breaker
    The £50,000 needs to grow at, on average, 3.54% pa to give a fund of £84,254 after 16 years which at an annuity rate of 6.96% will produce a pension of £5,864.
    The only thing that is constant is change.
  • Paul_Herring
    Paul_Herring Posts: 7,484 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    zygurat789 wrote: »
    The £50,000 needs to grow at, on average, 3.54% pa to give a fund of £84,254 after 16 years which at an annuity rate of 6.96% will produce a pension of £5,864.

    I'm sure whichever firm is taking his £50,000 will quite easily manage 3.54% pa over that term to give him back a pension of £5,864 pa.
    Conjugating the verb 'to be":
    -o I am humble -o You are attention seeking -o She is Nadine Dorries
  • mbarge
    mbarge Posts: 30 Forumite
    edited 6 July 2010 at 5:20PM
    zygurat789 wrote: »
    The £50,000 needs to grow at, on average, 3.54% pa to give a fund of £84,254 after 16 years which at an annuity rate of 6.96% will produce a pension of £5,864.

    I doubt that's right - have you allowed for future improvement to mortality which will affect annuity rates? 17 years from now mortality rates are projected to be 20%-30% lighter than they are today.
  • mbarge
    mbarge Posts: 30 Forumite
    I'm sure whichever firm is taking his £50,000 will quite easily manage 3.54% pa over that term to give him back a pension of £5,864 pa.


    You'll need a lot more that 3.54%pa to fund a pension of £5864 in 17 years time given the annuity rate risk. And what about interest rates? This is not a 17 year risk it's more like a 50 year risk.
  • Paul_Herring
    Paul_Herring Posts: 7,484 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    mbarge wrote: »
    17 years from now mortality rates are projected to be 20%-30% lighter than they are today.

    Credible citation please. The Mail or The Times don't count.
    Conjugating the verb 'to be":
    -o I am humble -o You are attention seeking -o She is Nadine Dorries
  • mbarge
    mbarge Posts: 30 Forumite
    edited 6 July 2010 at 5:51PM
    Credible citation please. The Mail or The Times don't count.

    CMI Reports from the Institute of Actuaries.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.4K Life & Family
  • 261.3K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.