We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Cushioning the benefit cuts: Times 1/7/10
silvercar
Posts: 50,009 Ambassador
"£60m cushion is set aside to ease cuts in housing benefits"
Maybe the cuts won't be so fierce after all:
Maybe the cuts won't be so fierce after all:
Emergency funds worth £60 million have been set aside to cushion the blow from cuts to housing benefit.
Steve Webb, the Pensions Minister, said that the discretionary housing benefit fund had been trebled from £20 million to prevent families living in expensive properties from becoming homeless.
Last week George Osborne imposed a rental ceiling of £400 a week for a four-bedroom house with lower figures for smaller accommodation. Average rents for all homes are also being cut by 40 per cent under separate measures to reduce the £21 billion bill.
Mr Webb said that the Government was aware many families could struggle to find new, cheaper homes in high-cost areas such as London and may need to stay in their existing property for longer.
“We are looking closely at the implementation of these plans and the issues around areas of high-cost housing. We have trebled to £60 million the size of the housing benefit fund, which will help many of the hard cases,” he said at a welfare reform conference in London.
Any family affected by the changes can apply, but will have to make a strong case as to why they need to stay in their home for longer. Mr Webb was responding to criticism from campaign groups that predict thousands of families will end up on the streets.
Iain Duncan Smith, the Work and Pensions Secretary, said that plans to make sure work always paid more than benefits would be unveiled soon. He said millions of claimants were making a “rational choice” to stay on benefits.
“At present, the poorest in our society see little reason to take the risk of finding a job and losing their benefits. Seen in the light of the calculation made on the basis of risk and reward, the decision looks rational,” he said.
I'm a Forum Ambassador on the housing, mortgages & student money saving boards. I volunteer to help get your forum questions answered and keep the forum running smoothly. Forum Ambassadors are not moderators and don't read every post. If you spot an illegal or inappropriate post then please report it to forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com (it's not part of my role to deal with this). Any views are mine and not the official line of MoneySavingExpert.com.
0
Comments
-
Oooh, does that mean you subscribe to The Times?
I can't see 40m being much more than drop in the ocean, though, nationally.0 -
Oooh, does that mean you subscribe to The Times?
All my little secrets coming out now;)
Times online is free to 7 day subscribers of the Times newspapers.
Very moneysaving as its cheaper than buying the paper everyday:)
Could be even cheaper if I went for the "pay full price and get free delivery within M25" option, but don't like to deprive the local newsagent of work.:AI'm a Forum Ambassador on the housing, mortgages & student money saving boards. I volunteer to help get your forum questions answered and keep the forum running smoothly. Forum Ambassadors are not moderators and don't read every post. If you spot an illegal or inappropriate post then please report it to forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com (it's not part of my role to deal with this). Any views are mine and not the official line of MoneySavingExpert.com.0 -
How about they give me £30m and i'll be happy to find these families some 4 bedroomed homes for less than £1800 a month. A net saving of £10m to the taxpayer.0
-
No no!
I want that job!
I'll do it for only 28 million!
Bargain.
0 -
So how long can they stay in these high rent places before the £60m runs out?
This could postpone rents/house prices falling.0 -
Silverbull wrote: »So how long can they stay in these high rent places before the £60m runs out?
This could postpone rents/house prices falling.
I think the idea is that there are some families that will genuinely face nasty outcomes if forced to move quickly from higher rent places. The funds are meant to buy people time not to undermine the policy.
Spending £40,000,000 to make a cut of £1,800,000,000 more humane seems sensible from an economic and political pov to me.0 -
The best thing to do is run off a list of who they are, pop round to see them to let them know they'll have to be moving, let them know their new rent max amount, then help them find somewhere elsewhere .... and help them pack the van.
Left to their own devices they'll sit on their thumbs until the final day and then go "oh, me? oh ... really? how's that work then? eh?"0 -
Should just throw them out and they'll soon find somewhere to live then.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.4K Spending & Discounts
- 245.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.6K Life & Family
- 259.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards