We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Why house prices must fall by 28 per cent

135

Comments

  • FATBALLZ
    FATBALLZ Posts: 5,146 Forumite
    This is a shocker, I was certain they were going to fall by 27%.
  • Silverbull
    Silverbull Posts: 369 Forumite
    28% isn't really "all that much" is it.
    :)


    You wouldnt call 28% a crash?

    Id hate to see what youd call a crash.

    Anyway 28% average falls will mean some places fall over 50%. As some already cheap areas in Wales etc cant really fall much more.
  • System
    System Posts: 178,375 Community Admin
    10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    How many alias' is that for downey now? 12?
    This is a system account and does not represent a real person. To contact the Forum Team email forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com
  • Yakubu22
    Yakubu22 Posts: 640 Forumite
    500 Posts
    Do we have details on what the average house actually looks like? If it's a 1 bed apartment/house then I think the market is in real trouble! If, on the other hand, its a three bed semi then I dont understand why this would impact first time buyers. I certainly didn't buy a three bedder for my first home - though had interest rates been as low as they are now, then perhaps I would have? ;):)

    I guess my question is, why is this report comparing the cost of an average house to the income of first time buyers, when the average ftb would not be buying the average house? I hope my question makes sense to someone, I think I have too many occurances of the word average! :)

    I agree that while FTBs traditionally started with a flat or small house and progressed to say a 3-bed semi (family sized home). With the average age of a FTB now being in their 30s. It means that 1 bed apartments aren't suitable for their requirements.
    Very few FTBs are in their early 20s and so buying an apartment with intentions to bring up a family in the next few years is daft.

    I agree FTBs shouldn't always expect to be able to get an "average" priced house. But if you're the average FTB and 34yo, then waiting another 5 years to build up equity. Just so you can afford reasonable space to start a family, isn't right either.
    "For those who understand, no explanation is necessary. Those who don't understand, dont matter."
  • chucky
    chucky Posts: 15,170 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    edited 30 June 2010 at 3:46PM
    Yakubu22 wrote: »
    But if you're the average FTB and 34yo
    it's actually 32 :)

    http://www.communities.gov.uk/documents/housing/xls/141293.xls

    interesting that FTB's are younger now than it was in 1990
  • RenovationMan
    RenovationMan Posts: 4,227 Forumite
    I did a quick google on the average age of a FT Buyer:

    The age of the average first time buyer has risen to 34 from 27 in 30 years, according to a study by loan provider GE Money Home Lending and customer research organisation The Future Foundation.
    The survey, which compares attitudes today with those of 30 years ago, also shows 76% of consumers see first time buyer affordability as worse than before as house price inflation has risen 1,436% over 30 years.
    The proportion of homeowners buying with a spouse has decreased since 1977 from 80% to just a third today. Almost 30% of first time buyers today buy alone, almost double the figure in 1977. More than 51% of all first time buyers now receive some form of financial support from parents or grandparents.
    Gerry Bell, head of mortgage marketing at GE Money Home Lending, says: “Our analysis reveals that today’s potential younger buyers have vastly different attitudes, aspirations and lifestyles to their counterparts 30 years ago. This refusal to conform to traditional family-oriented motivations and the desire to gain independence and experience, undoubtedly delays the purchase of a first home and contributes to the ongoing affordability issues faced by these consumers.”
    In 1977 more than half of first time buyers said marriage was their main reason for buying property, compared with just 14% in 2007. Independence is the main reason for buying a home today for more than a half of consumers, compared with under a third in 1977.

    While FT Buyers may be older, it doesn't seem to follow that they're looking to buy family homes because not only are they putting off buying their first home until a later age, they're also putting of having a family until a later age.

    Women are also more likely to have children later in their lives: whilst in 1971 the average age to have a child was just over 23, in 2007 it was 28.
    The survey saw a significant increase in the number of working people living alone, which has doubled since 1971. Now, 12 per cent of adults live on their own, with the largest increase among working-age adults.
  • JonnyBravo
    JonnyBravo Posts: 4,103 Forumite
    Mortgage-free Glee!
    I hope my question makes sense to someone, I think I have too many occurances of the word average! :)

    The average post should contain no more averages than 4 on average. If your average of averages per post is significantly higher than this then there is a great danger that the average man, or indeed average woman, won't have a clue what you're on about.... [STRIKE]on average[/STRIKE] typically.

    HTH.
  • buglawton
    buglawton Posts: 9,246 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    bouche wrote: »
    We all read what we want to read and hear what we want to hear.

    28% crash??? - is never gonna happen.

    28% rise??? - with a long term investment I see no reason this shouldn't happen in. say 10-15 years. Easy!!

    Which, assuming 2 to 3 percent compound inflation per year, would mean no real price rise at all.
  • phil_b_2
    phil_b_2 Posts: 995 Forumite
    Joeskeppi wrote: »
    We've officially gone full circle now, we're back to "wait til the winter".

    Winter is the new 'spring' in the housing world. Prices will jump 10%!
  • chucky
    chucky Posts: 15,170 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    buglawton wrote: »
    Which, assuming 2 to 3 percent compound inflation per year, would mean no real price rise at all.
    do you know what that means in real terms?
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.