We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Wages Owed

2»

Comments

  • Premier_2
    Premier_2 Posts: 15,141 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    edited 24 June 2010 at 9:44PM
    MyRubyRed wrote: »
    Wrong I'm afraid. The initial objection with the evidence you outline will defer the objection for probably 3 to 6 months but unless you then pay up Companies House will carry out the strike off, unless there is another biggger creditor who forces it (HRMC for example)
    1. In what circumstances may a company apply to be struck off the register?
    A company may apply to the registrar to be struck off the register and dissolved. The company can do this if it is no longer needed. For example, the directors may wish to retire and there is no one to take over from them; or it is a subsidiary whose name is no longer needed; or it was set up to exploit an idea that turned out not to be feasible.
    This procedure is not an alternative to formal insolvency proceedings where these are appropriate. Even if the company is struck off and dissolved, creditors and others could apply for the company to be restored to the register. Further information about restoration can be found in chapter 3. A list of persons who can apply to the court for a company to be restored can be found in question 1 of chapter 3.

    ...

    11. How and why can they object?



    Objections or complaints must be in writing and sent to the registrar with any supporting evidence, such as copies of invoices that may prove the company is trading. Reasons could include:
    • if the company has broken any of the conditions of its application for example, it has traded, changed its name or become subject to insolvency proceedings during the three-month period before the application, or afterwards;
    • if the directors have not informed interested parties;
    • if any of the declarations on the form are false;
    • if some form of action is being taken, or is pending, to recover any money owed (such as a winding-up petition or action in a small claims court);
    • if other legal action is being taken against the company;
    • if the directors have wrongfully traded or committed a tax fraud or some other offence.
    A full list of conditions can be found in sections 1004 and 1005 of the Companies Act 2006.
    12. Offences and penalties



    It is an offence:
    • to apply when the company is ineligible for striking-off (see question 2);
    • to provide false or misleading information in, or in support of, an application;
    • not to copy the application to all relevant parties within seven days;
    • not to withdraw application if the company becomes ineligible.
    The offences attract a fine of up to a maximum of £5,000 on summary conviction (before a magistrates' court or Sheriff Court) or an unlimited fine on indictment (before a jury). If the directors breach the requirements to give a copy of the application to relevant parties and do so with the intention of concealing the application , they are also potentially liable to not only a fine but also up to seven years imprisonment. Anyone convicted of these offences may also be disqualified from being a director for up to 15 years.
    http://www.companieshouse.gov.uk/about/gbhtml/gp4.shtml#ch1

    It would be a hefty claim that cost £900 to file.
    Mcol allows claims up to £100k for just £595 (with lower fees for lesser amounts)
    "Now to trolling as a concept. .... Personally, I've always found it a little sad that people choose to spend such a large proportion of their lives in this way but they do, and we have to deal with it." - MSE Forum Manager 6th July 2010
  • MyRubyRed
    MyRubyRed Posts: 941 Forumite
    edited 24 June 2010 at 9:59PM
    I can only speak from actual experience. The claim was not hefty ....apart from the reduncy payment which the Redundancy Payment Scheme paid out on lt was a measly £1500 each for 4 blokes. Not a lot I know but enough to keep heads above water for a short while. As said I got them their basic redundancy but they were screwed for the rest. If you can tell me where I went wrong and/or provide another avenue I am all ears.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.4K Life & Family
  • 261.4K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.