We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Public Sector Pensions...

1356711

Comments

  • Sphynx
    Sphynx Posts: 877 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 500 Posts Combo Breaker
    I already pay 11% into my public sector pension. It's not my fault the government chose not the invest the money put into the pot and just spent it recklessly. Now they are moaning because they are going to take on less public servants and won't have enough workers to pay those in retirement. Not very forward thinking. I think it's dispicable that MP's are going to keep all their pension rights (they don't pay much if anything towards it)? whilst the rest of us pay for THEIR mistakes. There have been areas of the public service that traditionally don't contribute much towards their pension (armed forces), that isn't true of everyone. I really don't see how they can justify not taking the same measures on themselves :mad:
  • Andy_L
    Andy_L Posts: 13,151 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 21 June 2010 at 8:56AM
    My only complaint is that MP's will be exempt......so obviously, we're not all in this together.

    Where does it say the MP's scheme would be exempt?

    Edit: Ignore that, I'm being a blind bufoon
  • Andy_L
    Andy_L Posts: 13,151 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Looking at public sector pensions from the inside, I can see that staff in whitehall and central government generally have much much lower contributions than staff in the NHS and local councils. I personal pay 6.5% of my gross wage into my pension every month, where as those in whitehall pay just 3%...

    True, however the CS has lower salaries than NHS (don't know about Local Gov) so swings and roundabouts
  • Andy_L
    Andy_L Posts: 13,151 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    dori2o wrote: »
    The CS pension is compulsary and by that basis I should decide what contribution is paid into it.

    No it isn't
  • StevieJ
    StevieJ Posts: 20,174 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    It appears that the govt have provided a masterclass in managing expectations within the public sector, it started with the wicked witch from the east and has been picked up readily by her protege. It appears the Turkeys have accepted that Christmas will soon be upon us.
    'Just think for a moment what a prospect that is. A single market without barriers visible or invisible giving you direct and unhindered access to the purchasing power of over 300 million of the worlds wealthiest and most prosperous people' Margaret Thatcher
  • treliac
    treliac Posts: 4,524 Forumite
    muhasib wrote: »
    There are well paid jobs in teaching that can make you rich - Ofsted Inspectors, Headmasters, Directors of Education to name some; I know quite a few doing very well indeed - granted for those of us still in the classroom its not the same.

    If there are cuts to be made it would be good to think they will fall on those with inflated salaries rather than basic and pretty low paid front line staff. I worry that good quality candidates will not be attracted into important work such as teaching otherwise.

    Unfortunately, the anti-public sector brigade rear up in their distorted thinking that everyone is well paid.
  • dori2o
    dori2o Posts: 8,150 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts
    This is a good read on the CS pensions.

    http://www.civilservant.org.uk/pensions.shtml
    [SIZE=-1]To equate judgement and wisdom with occupation is at best . . . insulting.
    [/SIZE]
  • ILW
    ILW Posts: 18,333 Forumite
    treliac wrote: »
    If there are cuts to be made it would be good to think they will fall on those with inflated salaries rather than basic and pretty low paid front line staff. I worry that good quality candidates will not be attracted into important work such as teaching otherwise.

    Unfortunately, the anti-public sector brigade rear up in their distorted thinking that everyone is well paid.

    The problem with teachers is that it is virtually impossible to sack a "not very good" one. This devalues the whole profession.
  • thescouselander
    thescouselander Posts: 5,547 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Fair enough but I accept lower pay in my job because of the terms of the pension. If the pension changes to match that offered in the private sector there is going to be a lot of pressure for pay to do the same (ie to go up). Really public sector pensions are just a way for the government to defer the wages of public sector employees - if they go to the private sector model this could actually cost more in the short term.
  • ILW
    ILW Posts: 18,333 Forumite
    Fair enough but I accept lower pay in my job because of the terms of the pension. If the pension changes to match that offered in the private sector there is going to be a lot of pressure for pay to do the same (ie to go up). Really public sector pensions are just a way for the government to defer the wages of public sector employees - if they go to the private sector model this could actually cost more in the short term.

    Are you sure you accept lower pay, are there direct comparisons with the private sector?
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 353.8K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 246.8K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.2K Life & Family
  • 260.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.