We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Knock on effect of BP's $20 Billion cleanup....

245

Comments

  • StevieJ
    StevieJ Posts: 20,174 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    BP shares have recovered a little today + 8%.
    'Just think for a moment what a prospect that is. A single market without barriers visible or invisible giving you direct and unhindered access to the purchasing power of over 300 million of the worlds wealthiest and most prosperous people' Margaret Thatcher
  • chucky
    chucky Posts: 15,170 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    wymondham wrote: »
    .... am I right in thinking I heard that BP is an important pension source for many people (beyond their employees etc)?? If so, what is the effect this big dent is likely to make to the UK pensioner??
    with the bonds being moved down a couple of notches - does that impact funds who hold shares.

    i know they're different but is there any regulation that funds are only allowed to hold a maximum number of shares for firms with a certain rating?
  • StevieJ
    StevieJ Posts: 20,174 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Interesting analysis, from a Septic.
    Could BP be forced into bankruptcy by lawsuits, fines and penalties? It could be, but given the above cash flow numbers, I see that as unlikely. In addition, if backed into a corner by an administration more interested in finger-pointing and finding a scapegoat than in partnering with energy providers, BP could say “Enough. We cannot stand idly by as your whipping boy while you drive our company into bankruptcy.” If that happens, and they are forced to play hardball to survive, we need to remember that the value of the “responsible party” (BP America) is about $25 billion. Anytime the US government decides to finance its deficit spending and its various gifts to Wall Street by riding BP into the ground, BP “could” simply declare BP America insolvent and let everyone pick among its bones. That would still leave BP the 75% of its business conducted beyond US shores, with roughly 75% of its current $30 billion annual cash flow intact. I see the bankruptcy of the entire company as unlikely and assign only a 10% probability to that occurence
    .

    http://www.stockopedia.co.uk/content/is-bp-plc-headed-to-70-or-0/43271
    'Just think for a moment what a prospect that is. A single market without barriers visible or invisible giving you direct and unhindered access to the purchasing power of over 300 million of the worlds wealthiest and most prosperous people' Margaret Thatcher
  • ash28
    ash28 Posts: 1,789 Forumite
    Mortgage-free Glee! Debt-free and Proud!
    wymondham wrote: »
    .... am I right in thinking I heard that BP is an important pension source for many people (beyond their employees etc)?? If so, what is the effect this big dent is likely to make to the UK pensioner??

    I've just looked at my pension scheme's investments and 1.5% of the assets are held in BP shares, I'm not concerned as pension funds don't look at the short term. Even if BP go bust I'm not too concerned, pension schemes seem to spread their investments far and wide - I suppose to minimise risk.

    How it will impact individual investors, could be quite badly I would think.
  • headcone wrote: »
    I will cos I know;)


    So there was a rush on buying.

    Doesn't mean its good for the buyer but the traders have done well.

    Now it will pan out & go up or down a little until it hits them that $20bn aint enough money....
    Not Again
  • Thrugelmir
    Thrugelmir Posts: 89,546 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    ash28 wrote: »
    I've just looked at my pension scheme's investments and 1.5% of the assets are held in BP shares, I'm not concerned as pension funds don't look at the short term. Even if BP go bust I'm not too concerned, pension schemes seem to spread their investments far and wide - I suppose to minimise risk.

    How it will impact individual investors, could be quite badly I would think.

    Pension funds hold (held) shares in the banks , yet no one commented back in 2008.

    As you say holding a diversified portfolio is the key.
  • Wookster
    Wookster Posts: 3,795 Forumite
    Obama would do well to remember the contempt with which Union Carbide treated safety in his Indian plant.

    At least 2,259 people died. Babies are still being born with deformities.

    The US refused to extradite Warren Anderson.

    $2M was placed into an account similar to the $20bn BP has placed in escrow.

    Disgusting!
  • Generali
    Generali Posts: 36,411 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Before we get too excited, take a look at the BP forum on the Fool website:

    http://boards.fool.co.uk/bp-plc-bp-50207.aspx?mid=11953714

    Lots of interesting posts on there including a discussion about which bits of BP are and aren't in US hands. According to a couple of posters, BP USA can be demerged from the rest of BP and be allowed to sink or swim as the situation permits. The US Government probably doesn't have any realistic way to act against the rest of BP and the Directors would be in breech of the 'fiduciary responsibility' they hold to their shareholders if they voluntarily pay out from the rest of BP more than the value of BP USA.

    No idea if it's true or not. The arguements are very convincing though.
  • setmefree2
    setmefree2 Posts: 9,072 Forumite
    Mortgage-free Glee!
    Wookster wrote: »
    Obama would do well to remember the contempt with which Union Carbide treated safety in his Indian plant.

    At least 2,259 people died. Babies are still being born with deformities.

    The US refused to extradite Warren Anderson.

    $2M was placed into an account similar to the $20bn BP has placed in escrow.

    Disgusting!

    Couldn't agree more. The self-righteous indignation from Obama has turned my stomach and, I have to say, he has really gone down in my estimations. (Not that he cares :) LOL.)

    The yanks go around this planet polluting without a care - well now they've really gone and done it....
  • ash28
    ash28 Posts: 1,789 Forumite
    Mortgage-free Glee! Debt-free and Proud!
    edited 17 June 2010 at 2:47PM
    Generali wrote: »
    Before we get too excited, take a look at the BP forum on the Fool website:

    http://boards.fool.co.uk/bp-plc-bp-50207.aspx?mid=11953714

    Lots of interesting posts on there including a discussion about which bits of BP are and aren't in US hands. According to a couple of posters, BP USA can be demerged from the rest of BP and be allowed to sink or swim as the situation permits. The US Government probably doesn't have any realistic way to act against the rest of BP and the Directors would be in breech of the 'fiduciary responsibility' they hold to their shareholders if they voluntarily pay out from the rest of BP more than the value of BP USA.

    No idea if it's true or not. The arguements are very convincing though.

    I haven't looked at the forum - but I did read that 25% of BP was in the US and that they could put the US segment into bankruptcy but leave the rest intact.

    I suppose there is always the possibility too, that they could be banned from operating in the US.

    BP is the leading producer of oil and natural gas in the United States and the largest investor in U.S. energy development












    The BP family of brands includes Amoco, ARCO, and BP gasolines, as well as am/pm retail outlets and Castrol motor oil.






    Investing in American Energy



    Since 2004, BP has invested over $35 billion in the United States to increase existing energy sources, extend energy supplies and develop new low-carbon technologies. BP employs more than 29,000 people in the US, has $48 billion in fixed assets, and sells more than15 billion gallons of gasoline every year.

    http://www.bp.com/sectiongenericarticle.do?categoryId=488&contentId=2000734
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.4K Life & Family
  • 261.3K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.