Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

BloomBerg News: Small Nuclear Device Only Way To Stop Oil Spill :)

Options
13»

Comments

  • Asheron
    Asheron Posts: 1,229 Forumite
    GDB2222 wrote: »
    Well, give it say a billion years and it really will replenish itself. I'll catch a bit of sleep in the meantime.

    lol :) it's quicker than you could ever imagine :)
    As an investor, you know that any kind of investment opportunity has its risks, and investing in Stocks or Precious Metals is highly speculative. All of the content I post is for informational purposes only.
  • matbe
    matbe Posts: 568 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 500 Posts
    I'm not saying it is the right answer, however it has been successfully deployed as a solution to cracked underground bore heads by the Russians on several occasions, although never at this depth.

    It's the knee jerk 'NO NUKES' response from people (no disrespect) whose understanding of the subject is nil.

    It won't irradiate the GOM, it won't kill wildlife... well maybe a small percentage of local deep sea life from the shockwave - but still a .00001% of those that are currently dying horrible deaths from oil & dispersant contamination

    Face the facts, then act.


    The Russians oil well was on land for a start,and they had 5 attempts with nuclear devices before it was succesful.

    They haven't a clue what a nuke would do at this depth.

    The knee jerk reaction is using nukes.
  • Bullfighter
    Bullfighter Posts: 414 Forumite
    Asheron wrote: »
    NO, Peak oil is not true, Oil will never run out, it replenishes itself over time.

    Abiogenic petroleum formation has been well and truly debunked.

    Every sample of oil and gas ever analysed has demonstrated levorotary properties, a statistic that leans decidedly toward ancient biological origin. That is, "dead dinosaurs." No sample has ever exhibited properties that suggest it was created abiotically.

    If Oil was really being constantly replenished why are we being forced to refine tar sands or drill a mile under the ocean? Surely the Beverly Hillbillys would still be hitting black gold in their yard every other week??
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.6K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177K Life & Family
  • 257.5K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.