We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Advice: Manager earning less than new (transferred) Employee ??
CheekyMonkey
Posts: 227 Forumite
In a couple of months time an existing employee from another part of the business will join my team of 8 people. Due to the fact that they are closing the other department the 'new' team member and myself dont have a choice.
The problem I now have, after finally received all the transfer details from HR is that:-
1) the person is on a higher salary
2) they are the same grade, but have never managed
3) they have agreed reduced working hours as part of the transfer.
To say I feel a bit pee'd off is an understatement.
Can my company honestly expect me to manager someone earning more than me??
The problem I now have, after finally received all the transfer details from HR is that:-
1) the person is on a higher salary
2) they are the same grade, but have never managed
3) they have agreed reduced working hours as part of the transfer.
To say I feel a bit pee'd off is an understatement.
Can my company honestly expect me to manager someone earning more than me??
Some days you're the bird......and some days you're the statue :cool:
0
Comments
-
Yes
Its fairly common where people are displaced for them to work a less job but retain their higher salary. It avoids the necessity for redundancy.
I would be questioning your ability if you dont think you can manage this situation.0 -
Weirdlittleman wrote: »Yes
Its fairly common where people are displaced for them to work a less job but retain their higher salary. It avoids the necessity for redundancy.
I would be questioning your ability if you dont think you can manage this situation.
So you believe I should just accept the situation. Is that what you would do?Some days you're the bird......and some days you're the statue :cool:0 -
Yes you should be able to manage team members earning more than you, regardless of whether they are the same grade or a higher grade than you.
Its not that uncommon to end up managing people earning more than yourself - especially if they have in-demand skills, for example some technical skills are rare and will pay more than previous management experience.0 -
CheekyMonkey wrote: »So you believe I should just accept the situation. Is that what you would do?
Yes you should accept the situation
If you feel your salary is currently low for your job then renegotiate it however I would stress that managing someone on the same scale as you or being paid more shouldnt be the catalyst for this.
It actually shows you up as a poor manager if you cannot do it.0 -
OK.........how can I say this without giving too much detail.
New person is a Grade 2 (2nd level, same as me), and is at the top end of that pay structure. BUT they have been and will continue to be doing a Grade 1 job.
Other grade 1's within my team will be earning a lot less, but actually have more technical skills.Some days you're the bird......and some days you're the statue :cool:0 -
CheekyMonkey wrote: »OK.........how can I say this without giving too much detail.
New person is a Grade 2 (2nd level, same as me), and is at the top end of that pay structure. BUT they have been and will continue to be doing a Grade 1 job.
Other grade 1's within my team will be eaning a lot less, but actually have more technical skills.
Sorry but what are you getting at? We all understood the situation perfectly fine. Its actually very common as when people are displaced the company will give them a grade 1 job but not restructure their salary to avoid redundancy.
As a manager your job title hasnt changed and you should continue to deliver your responsibilities as you would with anyone else. The fact they are on a higher scale than normal is irrelevent, there job title will be the scale 1 i.e you manage them.
You really are making a situation out of nothing and if I was your manager I would be extremely worried about your capability to do your job.0 -
Weirdlittleman wrote: »Sorry but what are you getting at? We all understood the situation perfectly fine. Its actually very common as when people are displaced the company will give them a grade 1 job but not restructure their salary to avoid redundancy.
As a manager your job title hasnt changed and you should continue to deliver your responsibilities as you would with anyone else. The fact they are on a higher scale than normal is irrelevent, there job title will be the scale 1 i.e you manage them.
You really are making a situation out of nothing and if I was your manager I would be extremely worried about your capability to do your job.
Possibly my original post was a little too limited in content to explain the whole situation and also slightly rushed, so based on the info provided I can understand your comments.
BUT.......we dont all possess your vast knowledge of management and obvious assumptions 'weirdlittleman'. Thanks for the kind assistance though.Some days you're the bird......and some days you're the statue :cool:0 -
It's not an unusual situation, I've come across it many times, normally with people who had been with the company a long time and were on a higher payscale. Or transferred through TUPE.
In sectors where salaries have been going down (any where they haven't....?) newer staff are paid less.
Obviously managers who are paid less than their staff are not happy, but they don't have much choice.0 -
it should only be a problem if you make it one, because unless EVERYONE knows EVERYONE ELSE's salary, your team member won't know that they earn more than you.Signature removed for peace of mind0
-
It's not necessarily about it being awkward though is it? If you're taking on more work and more responsibility, you'd surely expect to be rewarded with more pay. Otherwise, you might as well be doing the reduced responsibility post.Sealed Pot Challenge #239
Virtual Sealed Pot #131
Save 12k in 2014 #98 £3690/£60000
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.3K Spending & Discounts
- 247.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.4K Life & Family
- 261.3K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards