We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

2007 assessment

borders_dude
borders_dude Posts: 1,974 Forumite
edited 13 May 2010 at 6:38PM in Child support
I got a letter this week from the CSA.

Basically whilst going through my records when responding to a request from the ICE they have discovered that at the request of the PWC a reassesmetn was to be carried out. That was in March 2007 but this was never actioned by the CSA.

They are now actioning it for the period March 2007 to July 2008. In July 2008 at my request a re-assessment was carried out.

Now I have lodged my complaint which I will pursure vigourously as I have done before.

However, Do the CSA still have the legal right to carry out a reassessment for the period March 2007 to July 2008 even though we are now in 2010?
When dealing with the CSA its important to note that it is commonly accepted as unfit for purpose, and by default this also means the staff are unfit for purpose.

Comments

  • kelloggs36
    kelloggs36 Posts: 7,712 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Yes I'm afraid they do - it was an error that they didn't but that does not mean that any potential arrears you may have accrued won't be chargeable to you. However it it goes down, you will owe less as you will have overpaid.
  • CSA_Help
    CSA_Help Posts: 1,318 Forumite
    I got a letter this week from the CSA.

    Basically whilst going through my records when responding to a request from the ICE they have discovered that at the request of the PWC a reassesmetn was to be carried out. That was in March 2007 but this was never actioned by the CSA.

    They are now actioning it for the period March 2007 to July 2008. In July 2008 at my request a re-assessment was carried out.

    Now I have lodged my complaint which I will pursure vigourously as I have done before.

    However, Do the CSA still have the legal right to carry out a reassessment for the period March 2007 to July 2008 even though we are now in 2010?


    Yes they done it with me and backdated the assessment 2 years Another abuse of power
  • Debicj
    Debicj Posts: 193 Forumite
    Kelloggs is right. The same thing happened with my case. I'm the PWC and I requested a reassessment in 2003. It wasn't done until 2008 because the CSA didn't take any notice of my request despite recording it in their records. This meant that because the NRP had only made minimal payments but should have been paying much more, substantial arrears came about. There has since been an ongoing battle with appeal after appeal due to various issues, so it has taken some time to sort out, and the actual arrears figure still isn't finalised.

    I would suggest you prepare yourself for having some arrears if your income has gone up since the last assessment, or perhaps as Kelloggs said, if the reassessment is for a smaller amount, you may be owed something as you may have overpaid.
  • RedSky
    RedSky Posts: 234 Forumite
    Do the DP files for an NRP show the dates that a PWC requested a reassessment?
    Should all NRPs be routinely checking their DP files to make sure there are minimal surprises in years to come from such CSA errors?
    Is it correct to assume a past CSA missed reassessment will only be actioned if the difference is 5%?
  • borders_dude
    borders_dude Posts: 1,974 Forumite
    Thanks for the info Kelloggs.

    During the period they are assessing me I was earning about 15 per week more than when they assessed me prior to that period, so atleast arears are going to be minimal.
    When dealing with the CSA its important to note that it is commonly accepted as unfit for purpose, and by default this also means the staff are unfit for purpose.
  • kelloggs36
    kelloggs36 Posts: 7,712 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    RedSky wrote: »
    Do the DP files for an NRP show the dates that a PWC requested a reassessment?
    Should all NRPs be routinely checking their DP files to make sure there are minimal surprises in years to come from such CSA errors?
    Is it correct to assume a past CSA missed reassessment will only be actioned if the difference is 5%?

    True, but it may have been missed also; they will do it but then say that nothing changes due to the 5% rule.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 353.5K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.1K Spending & Discounts
  • 246.6K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.1K Life & Family
  • 260.6K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.