We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Currency expansion

12467

Comments

  • MrEnglish
    MrEnglish Posts: 322 Forumite
    Very good post Tom.

    I love monetary history too.

    What do you think gold will go to this bull run? $10K oz?
  • tomterm8
    tomterm8 Posts: 5,892 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture Combo Breaker
    edited 12 May 2010 at 5:31PM
    MrEnglish wrote: »
    Very good post Tom.

    I love monetary history too.

    What do you think gold will go to this bull run? $10K oz?

    I'm fairly bad at predicting the gold market. Your guess is as good as mine. Over the very long term, gold remains fairly stable. Over a human lifetime, it's not anywhere near as stable, and there have been periods of twenty or thirty years where it is a losing proposition. My personal preference is for silver, since a very large percentage of the worlds silver supply has been mined, and silver (unlike gold) is fundamentally quite a useful thing. Used in electronic equipment, and slowly running out. Fundamentally, even if SHTF doesn't happen, I think silver will increase in value.
    “The ideas of debtor and creditor as to what constitutes a good time never coincide.”
    ― P.G. Wodehouse, Love Among the Chickens
  • MrEnglish
    MrEnglish Posts: 322 Forumite
    tomterm8 wrote: »
    I'm fairly bad at predicting the gold market. Your guess is as good as mine. Over the very long term, gold remains fairly stable. Over a human lifetime, it's not anywhere near as stable, and there have been periods of twenty or thirty years where it is a losing proposition. My personal preference is for silver, since a very large percentage of the worlds silver supply has been mined, and silver (unlike gold) is fundamentally quite a useful thing. Used in electronic equipment, and slowly running out. Fundamentally, even if SHTF doesn't happen, I think silver will increase in value.

    Yes and is it true that every year for several years now that more silver is used up industrially than is mined?

    If this is true how long before we run out of silver stockpiles?
  • MrEnglish
    MrEnglish Posts: 322 Forumite
    edited 12 May 2010 at 6:59PM
    Generali wrote: »
    The IMF hasn't given a trillion dollars to anyone I'm aware of.

    Generali

    "Fears that the $1 trillion super-financing package for heavily-indebted European countries will not-be far reaching enough has only served to spike interest in gold. "


    http://www.iii.co.uk/articles/articledisplay.jsp?article_id=10095909&section=Markets

    The Western financial world is officially in full panic mode. A nearly $1 trillion bailout of Greece confirms that fact. Our very own Federal Reserve is providing billions to the effort, but this is much more than a bailout for Greece. It is a bailout for banks holding Greek debt and the debt of other European nations teetering on default.

    http://usawatchdog.com/gold-is-money/
  • RDB
    RDB Posts: 872 Forumite
  • PrivatisetheNHSnow
    PrivatisetheNHSnow Posts: 491 Forumite
    edited 15 May 2010 at 1:09PM
    tomterm8 wrote: »
    Oh... first nobel prize economics winner who agrees with fractional reserve banking for the day: Krugman. Now you find me a living nobel prize economist who thinks we should return to the gold standard.

    you seem to imply fractional reserve banking and a gold standard are opposites. they're not.

    when countries like the US were on the gold standard, they had fractional reserve banking too.

    a fractional system is sustainable as long as there are no bank runs - it doesn't matter whether commercial bank reserves are fiat money or gold.

    the reason rome's system collapsed is the same reason our system will collapse - because it is based on exponential expansion of interest bearing credit-money. when credit expansion stops, and all savings and capital inflows from other countries dry up, game over.

    like us rome tried to stave off collapse by the equivalent of the government 'printing money' (debasing the coinage). but if you increase/debase the money supply without increasing production in the economy, then the value of money becomes decreased very quickly, leading to consequential social and economic problems.
  • RDB
    RDB Posts: 872 Forumite
    RDB wrote: »



    Anyone else following the story of the IMFs proposal for one worldwide currency?
  • tomterm8
    tomterm8 Posts: 5,892 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture Combo Breaker
    you seem to imply fractional reserve banking and a gold standard are opposites. .

    I certainly didn't intend to do so; I was talking in the context of previous posts in the thread. I don't think there is any realistic prospect of returning to a gold standard.
    “The ideas of debtor and creditor as to what constitutes a good time never coincide.”
    ― P.G. Wodehouse, Love Among the Chickens
  • StevieJ
    StevieJ Posts: 20,174 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    RDB wrote: »
    When all the childish playground stuff is finished, can you take it somewhere else.

    This Ron Paul

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CtvHAqK8P14

    is 100% correct that the Greek bailout money is just added to the currency supply out of thin air.

    If anyone disagrees with this, where does it come from?



    Or like Tomterm8 who thinks that abusing currency supply like this is actually a good thing.



    http://www.chartingstocks.net/2009/06/us-money-supply-updated-chart/

    The German taxpayers will be glad to hear that, I think they think it is coming out of their back pocket icon7.gif
    'Just think for a moment what a prospect that is. A single market without barriers visible or invisible giving you direct and unhindered access to the purchasing power of over 300 million of the worlds wealthiest and most prosperous people' Margaret Thatcher
  • RDB
    RDB Posts: 872 Forumite
    StevieJ wrote: »
    The German taxpayers will be glad to hear that, I think they think it is coming out of their back pocket icon7.gif

    What do you think Steve, where does the one trillion come from? Thin air?

    Why not 10 trillion? Wouldnt that be better?
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.3K Life & Family
  • 261.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.