We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Capital Gains Tax up to 40%!

11112141617

Comments

  • IveSeenTheLight
    IveSeenTheLight Posts: 13,322 Forumite
    It is in addition, I sold a house in 2003 that had both been my main residence for a few years and let out for 9-10 years, so I have been through the process already and claimed both.


    Is it still currently applicable though?
    I'd be interested to read the government website link showing the allowance
    :wall:
    What we've got here is....... failure to communicate.
    Some men you just can't reach.
    :wall:
  • dealsearcher
    dealsearcher Posts: 756 Forumite
    Blacklight wrote: »
    One issue with this is that capital gains are usually made over time so you're taxing someone for something at a single point in time for appreciation over a long period.

    You can't treat that simply like income tax.

    If I worked doing a job for ten years at £5k a year but deffered all payments until the end of that period you'd tax me like I just earned £50k, whereas spread over ten years I'd pay no tax at all.

    Hardly fair or just.

    A very important point. Anyone who had bought ten years ago when pension funds were doing so badly might be forgiven for thinking that property investment would be better than a pension. To realise your investment gain in one tax year is a major disadvantage in this tax system. The previous nine years of tax allowances are ignored.
  • IveSeenTheLight
    IveSeenTheLight Posts: 13,322 Forumite
    Thrugelmir wrote: »
    The fact that CGT is not paid until the asset is sold. Means that the asset can continue to grow tax free over that time frame enhancing the return.

    Not really a problem with that is the threshold for paying tax increased in line with the timeframe the capital gains was accumulated over i.e the allowances.

    Of course "allowing" the asset to grow tax free over the time frame ensures that it goes above any individual tax year threshold
    :wall:
    What we've got here is....... failure to communicate.
    Some men you just can't reach.
    :wall:
  • StevieJ
    StevieJ Posts: 20,174 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Not really a problem with that is the threshold for paying tax increased in line with the timeframe the capital gains was accumulated over i.e the allowances.

    Of course "allowing" the asset to grow tax free over the time frame ensures that it goes above any individual tax year threshold

    Top slicing relief is what is required to make that equitable.
    'Just think for a moment what a prospect that is. A single market without barriers visible or invisible giving you direct and unhindered access to the purchasing power of over 300 million of the worlds wealthiest and most prosperous people' Margaret Thatcher
  • StevieJ
    StevieJ Posts: 20,174 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    edited 13 May 2010 at 2:52PM
    Not as I understand it, but always open to being better informed.
    If you know the link, please let me know

    Here is the link

    https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/comment/32761155#Comment_32761155

    http://www.lawpack.co.uk/Knowledge/Property/BuyingAndSelling/article885.asp


    5. Get letting relief on your main residence.

    If you move into your second property and let out your first home, you can be entitled to "private letting relief". You can exempt up to £40,000 of the gain accrued during the period that the property was let out as private residential accommodation.

    Anyone who has a share in the property can claim it, so if the property is in joint names, you can claim £80,000 between you. With the main residence exemption and private letting relief, your overall capital gains tax bill can be reduced dramatically
    'Just think for a moment what a prospect that is. A single market without barriers visible or invisible giving you direct and unhindered access to the purchasing power of over 300 million of the worlds wealthiest and most prosperous people' Margaret Thatcher
  • chucknorris
    chucknorris Posts: 10,795 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Is it still currently applicable though?
    I'd be interested to read the government website link showing the allowance


    Yes it is still current:

    http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/helpsheets/hs283.pdf
    Chuck Norris can kill two stones with one birdThe only time Chuck Norris was wrong was when he thought he had made a mistakeChuck Norris puts the "laughter" in "manslaughter".I've started running again, after several injuries had forced me to stop
  • IveSeenTheLight
    IveSeenTheLight Posts: 13,322 Forumite

    I've read this and don't interpret it as applicable to BTL properties.
    It's applicable to properties which was your only or main residence.

    Normally you get a full exemption for your residential home and this section appears to capture those that part let or let out their main home for a period.
    Letting Relief
    If you only get partial relief because you have let some or all of your
    dwelling house as residential accommodation, you may be entitled to a
    further relief. This further relief is due where:
    you sell a dwelling house which is, or has been, your only or main
    residence, and
    • part or all of it has at some time in your period of ownership been let as
    residential accommodation.
    The amount of relief is the lowest of:
    • the amount of Private Residence Relief already calculated, or
    • £40,000, or
    • the amount of any chargeable gain you make because of the letting.
    Example 8
    You let 60% of your house as residential accommodation and occupied 40% as your home.
    You made a gain of £60,000 when you disposed of the property. You are entitled to Private
    Residence Relief for 40% of the gain – £24,000. Your remaining gain is £36,000 and it all
    results from the letting. The lowest of the three limits set out above is the amount of
    Private Residence Relief and so you are entitled to further Letting Relief of £24,000. Your
    chargeable gain will be £12,000.
    :wall:
    What we've got here is....... failure to communicate.
    Some men you just can't reach.
    :wall:
  • chucknorris
    chucknorris Posts: 10,795 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 13 May 2010 at 3:35PM
    I've read this and don't interpret it as applicable to BTL properties.
    It's applicable to properties which was your only or main residence.

    Normally you get a full exemption for your residential home and this section appears to capture those that part let or let out their main home for a period.

    That is what we have been (in relation to this relief) talking about, i.e. properties that have been BOTH your main residence and let out. It will not apply to pure investment properties
    Chuck Norris can kill two stones with one birdThe only time Chuck Norris was wrong was when he thought he had made a mistakeChuck Norris puts the "laughter" in "manslaughter".I've started running again, after several injuries had forced me to stop
  • IveSeenTheLight
    IveSeenTheLight Posts: 13,322 Forumite
    That is what we have been (in relation to this relief) talking about, i.e. properties that have been BOTH your main residence and let out. It will not apply to pure investment properties

    As I had interpretted it ;)
    :wall:
    What we've got here is....... failure to communicate.
    Some men you just can't reach.
    :wall:
  • twadge_face
    twadge_face Posts: 594 Forumite
    I think it's good to rise CGT before Income Tax. BTL is an investment just shares, albeit rather illiquid and clunky (lol!).

    Unearned wealth through the BTL tax break is one of the bing social dividers instigated by the Real Nasty Party (aka New Labour).

    Combine this with a true reduction in easy-to-get state benefits and perhaps we'll get to see a truly more fair Britain.
    Long live the faces of t'wunty.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 601K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259.1K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.