We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Nationwide: +1% MoM +10.5% YoY

1567810

Comments

  • Percy1983
    Percy1983 Posts: 5,244 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Out of interest how many of your homeowners could afford to buy the house you live in at there current value? (As in you are 20 years younger and don't own a house)
    Have my first business premises (+4th business) 01/11/2017
    Quit day job to run 3 businesses 08/02/2017
    Started third business 25/06/2016
    Son born 13/09/2015
    Started a second business 03/08/2013
    Officially the owner of my own business since 13/01/2012
  • System
    System Posts: 178,375 Community Admin
    10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    I'd only be 8, so no.
    This is a system account and does not represent a real person. To contact the Forum Team email forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com
  • ukcarper
    ukcarper Posts: 17,337 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Percy1983 wrote: »
    Out of interest how many of your homeowners could afford to buy the house you live in at there current value? (As in you are 20 years younger and don't own a house)

    A better question would be. Out of interest how many of you homeowners could afford to buy the first house you bought at current value? (As in you are 20 years younger and don't own a house). The answer is yes there is a similar house for sale which I could buy with a 4x joint mortgage and that is with my wife’s part time salary and the equivalent of my old salary. The mortgage would be bigger in relation to my salary i.e. 4x instead of 3.5 then.
  • Really2
    Really2 Posts: 12,397 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    I would be 14 and my house would not be built. So double no from me. :)
  • Really2
    Really2 Posts: 12,397 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    ukcarper wrote: »
    A better question would be. Out of interest how many of you homeowners could afford to buy the first house you bought at current value? (As in you are 20 years younger and don't own a house). The answer is yes there is a similar house for sale which I could buy with a 4x joint mortgage and that is with my wife’s part time salary and the equivalent of my old salary. The mortgage would be bigger in relation to my salary i.e. 4x instead of 3.5 then.

    My first house would be 3X joint now. It was 2.5X when we purchased 9 years ago.
  • Pete111
    Pete111 Posts: 5,333 Forumite
    Mortgage-free Glee!
    edited 30 April 2010 at 1:47PM
    Really2 wrote: »
    My first house would be 3X joint now. It was 2.5X when we purchased 9 years ago.



    On previous earnings (and assuming the same deposit?) Our first place mortage multiple would have increased from 2.6x to 3.8x

    on the other hand at current value it would be 1.2 x current joint income now - we bought it 6 years ago but our household income is at least triple what it was in 2004.

    Which is nice.
    Go round the green binbags. Turn right at the mouldy George Elliot, forward, forward, and turn left....at the dead badger
  • Really2
    Really2 Posts: 12,397 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Pete111 wrote: »
    On previous earnings (and assuming the same deposit?) Our first place mortage multiplie would have increased from 2.6x to 3.8x

    on the other hand at current value it would be 1.2 x current joint income now - we bought it 6 years ago but our household income is at least triple what it was in 2004.

    Which is nice.

    Wow thats a big increase.

    But as a comparison you can't use your wage X years ago and todays price as that removes your wage inflation. A person buying today would be on today's wages. So that would be what you think someone else would get paid now for the job you were doing X years ago. If you are doing the same job your wage now and price now are both adjusted to your personal inflation.
  • Pete111
    Pete111 Posts: 5,333 Forumite
    Mortgage-free Glee!
    edited 30 April 2010 at 1:58PM
    Really2 wrote: »
    Wow thats a big increase.

    But as a comparison you can't use your wage X years ago and todays price as that removes your wage inflation. A person buying today would be on today's wages. So that would be what you think someone else would get paid now for the job you were doing X years ago. If you are doing the same job your wage now and price now are both adjusted to your personal inflation.

    Can't complain. However, I should stress my wife takes the lions share of the plaudits for that - I only make the beer money!

    To cover your second point - I think thats's what I meant when I said it had gone up from 2.6 to 3.8 x salary - ie it would be much more of a stretch for 26 year old me (+ then fiance') to buy our flat now
    Go round the green binbags. Turn right at the mouldy George Elliot, forward, forward, and turn left....at the dead badger
  • nollag2006
    nollag2006 Posts: 2,638 Forumite
    :beer:

    Hmmmm, now, remind me again, who was it that was so very wrong about HPI not reaching double digits this year????

    Anyone?




    Great news for homeowners.

    Inflation has eroded the value of your mortgage, as you'll have had pay rises along the way too.:beer:

    For procrastinators, not so much..... Now house prices are more expensive, AND everything else is more expensive too.




    Hmmm, most of last years growth was from May onwards. We are due a post election bounce from May onwards this year.

    The slowdown in growth this year so far is primarily down to the Feb figures being low. And we all know that was the Snowmageddon problem skewing them.

    So much for the housing bears triumphalism.....

    Still, those cash buyers must run out soon, right?



    Oh dear....... ANOTHER bear meme utterly discredited.

    It was the increase in mortgage lending which has driven the recovery, not cash rich buyers.

    Ah well, surely there is a pent up supply of soon to be forced sellers building, right?



    Ahhhh...... So there probably won't be a big increase in supply of "motivated sellers" after all.

    So will we be seeing big price falls from the limited increased supply coming through?



    No falls then..... Just a decrease in the rate of growth.

    But I thought we were supposed to have a double dip in March???

    Whatever happened to that?


    :rotfl::rotfl::rotfl:
  • PhylPho
    PhylPho Posts: 1,443 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts
    The daft triumphalism of threads such as this must be viewed with despair by many an aspiring WTWP FTB.

    WTWP? Wozzat then? It stands for "Wrong Time / Wrong Place" and it's oh-so easily ignored by those whose tunnel vision is such as to lead to the assumption that the higher an area's property prices, the higher that area's average household income must be.

    On which basis there are vast swathes of over-priced Yorkshire and Cumbria (two counties I know particularly well; I actually saw a 3-bed 1950s semi for sale in Keswick yesterday: £345,000) where every school leaver gets on the ladder of adult life (and not long thereafter, the housing ladder) with a salary commensurate with the prices asked locally.

    Yeah. Right.

    Fact is, thousands of those young people are in the wrong place, at the wrong time.

    They made the mistake of being born in areas susceptible to the influx of funny money from elsewhere.

    They made the mistake of being born in areas where social housing stock was flogged off by the Thatcher Government without a care for its replacement or the consequences of successive re-sales that would ultimately see a £25-a-week Council house that served as a home for a rural family turned into a £300,000 holiday let owned by some guy spending a fifth of his City bonus.

    An island as small as this can no more afford the kind of ruptured Society we now have than a young couple can afford the kind of house prices so prevalent today.

    Those who think there's enormous satisfaction to be gained from seeing a rise in house prices are, one presumes, also going to derive equally enormous satisfaction at the way this country daily becomes more divided, more unequal, and more -- much more -- unfair.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.