We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The seven deadly sins of NS&I Premium Bonds

Jonbvn
Posts: 5,562 Forumite


Good article in the Telegraph from MSE Martin pointing out how poor PB's really are.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/personalfinance/savings/7607815/The-seven-deadly-sins-of-NSandI-Premium-Bonds.html
Given how so many people hold them, I thought it was worth another thread on the subject.
BTW, Gordon Brown would like to thank all the PB holders for their extreme generosity in providing so much money to HM Treasury at such a pitiful low rate.;)
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/personalfinance/savings/7607815/The-seven-deadly-sins-of-NSandI-Premium-Bonds.html
Given how so many people hold them, I thought it was worth another thread on the subject.
BTW, Gordon Brown would like to thank all the PB holders for their extreme generosity in providing so much money to HM Treasury at such a pitiful low rate.;)
In case you hadn't already worked it out - the entire global financial system is predicated on the assumption that you're an idiot:cool:
0
Comments
-
Martin has a bit of a bee in his bonnet about premium bonds.
I agree with some of his comments, but notice he never mentions that they can be useful to people who lose their higher allowances (for over 65s) at the rate of £2 for every extra £1 earned.
Plus, there are other poor financial buys that aren't referred to so regularly as premium bonds (e.g. cheaper insurance - lower premiums but worse service if you have to claim; a gambling introductory offer forum on a money saving website).0 -
Martin has a bit of a bee in his bonnet about premium bonds.
I think the point is that so many people hold them, given that they are such a poor product. I concur that there are worse examples around, but they usually don't effect quite so many people.
If you read the matched-betting forum, you will be aware that it is actually not about gambling at all.In case you hadn't already worked it out - the entire global financial system is predicated on the assumption that you're an idiot:cool:0 -
Poor compared to what, a savings account that pays 0.1% a year? Even the best savings accounts pay rubbish interest rates, you might as well put the money in premium bonds.0
-
Poor compared to what, a savings account that pays 0.1% a year? Even the best savings accounts pay rubbish interest rates, you might as well put the money in premium bonds.
The whole point of this website is to try and help people make the most of their money. As you are well aware (or maybe not?), there are numerous accounts that pay much better than 0.1%, and on average will give you a far better return than PB's.
If you want to gamble, try Ladbrokes.In case you hadn't already worked it out - the entire global financial system is predicated on the assumption that you're an idiot:cool:0 -
The whole point of this website is to try and help people make the most of their money. As you are well aware 9or mayb enot?), there are numerous accounts that pay much better than 0.1%, and on average will give you a far betterreturn than PB's.
If you want to gamble, try Ladbrokes.
Not many people want to keep moving their money every year to make the most of it especially since interest rates are so low anyway. Also everyone benefits from money put in PB's, banks benefit the most from regular savings accounts.0 -
Not many people want to keep moving their money every year to make the most of it especially since interest rates are so low anyway. Also everyone benefits from money put in PB's, banks benefit the most from regular savings accounts.
Instead of PB's, try index linked savings certificates (also from NS&I). A far superior product.In case you hadn't already worked it out - the entire global financial system is predicated on the assumption that you're an idiot:cool:0 -
Instead of PB's, try index linked savings certificates (also from NS&I). A far superior product.
Morning all.
£6 in premium bonds invested in 1963
£50 prize 2 years ago:)
4.85% return over 47 years tax free (annual compound):)
Doubt this long term investment has kept up with inflation:(
So think I shall stay with this level of investment;)
Frustratingly, cannot do an easy comparision with £6 of index linked certificates over the same time-frame......but given the high inflation between 1970-1980, pretty sure ILCs would have been a better bet if available then.
JamesU0 -
>Martin has a bit of a bee in his bonnet about premium bonds.<
Do NS&I pay for advertising on his site?0 -
amcluesent wrote: »Do NS&I pay for advertising on his site?
Nobody pays for advertising on the site. And Martin's view on Premium Bonds is negative, so not the kind of publicity that you'd want to pay for.0 -
Nobody pays for advertising on the site.
Although I wouldn't put all my savings in Premium Bonds, they can be a good one to have in your "Savings Portfolio". You may (although a small chance) win a larger prize and you always get your capital back (which you don't with the National Lottery).0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.7K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454K Spending & Discounts
- 244.7K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.3K Life & Family
- 258.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards