We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
BBC blog - Politician says lowering prices is "politcal suicide"
Comments
-
i'm sure that Right to Buy did nothing to fuel the appetite for home ownership and reduce the number of available houses to rent.Labour's deliberate open door immigration policies must have contributed massively to the shortages of affordable and social housing - from 1990 to 2000 the UK's population grew by 1.3 million, from 2000 to 2010 it grew by 4.5 million. I'm not sure what the figures on new house building are between those periods, but it seems likely they didn't catch up with the population increase.
all political parties are equally to blame but obviously Labour are to blame for that one too. right?0 -
i'm sure that Right to Buy did nothing to fuel the appetite for home ownership and reduce the number of available houses to rent.
all political parties are equally to blame but obviously Labour are to blame for that one too. right?
What? Your posts get weirder and weirder. I wasn't denying that Right to Buy has had a huge negative effect on the amount of social housing available to rent, I just didn't mention it because it started 30 years ago....
The Tories have undoubtedly done more damage to social housing than Labour, not just by Right to Buy but the changes they made to security of tenure.0 -
It is good to see that there is political consensus amongst the potential chancellors that the government should support house price growth0
-
Great article about how the US housing crash has destroyed the middle classes' wealth:
http://seekingalpha.com/article/199135-housing-and-the-end-of-upward-mobility-in-the-u-sThat means there is at best 6% equity in the other 51 million homes with mortgages... In effect, there is no inheritable wealth left in most mortgaged homes...That matters, because most U.S. households hold no appreciable wealth beyond their homesThe orgy of speculation, leverage and debt incentivized by the credit/housing bubble of 2000-2006 has, in the aftermath of the bubble's bursting, destroyed most of the nation's middle-class wealth
It shows why politicians in the UK will probably do anything (within reason) to support the housing market.0 -
Very disturbing that bears take such pleasure in seeing others lose their life savings, just so they can hold onto the vain hope that they can buy a house cheaply in the next few years.
Let me let you in on a secret ... it aint going to happen
0 -
nollag2006 wrote: »Very disturbing that bears take such pleasure in seeing others lose their life savings, just so they can hold onto the vain hope that they can buy a house cheaply in the next few years.
That's just silly. In any situation if you're a buyer then you obviously want prices to go down, if you're a seller the converse. Why is that 'disturbing'?
If people can't understand that property is not a risk free investment, then don't feel sorry for them. If you want your life savings to be secure at all costs without taking any risk, then you should put it in National Savings.0 -
Did he say that? I remember one girl asking about what are they going to do to ensure that when people like her graduate they can get jobs and buy houses. All 3 chancellors explained at length about the job situation and ignored the housing bit.
It may not have been the debate, but he just mentioned it again recently (saying that house prices had not corrected sufficiently and that was worrying).
I still just can't see where all the money is going to come from to sustain house prices. It has been shown that there aren't enough savings in the UK to support the UK mortgage market. At present, it seems that national & international money markets aren't functioning as liberally as they should. Add to that, governments borrowing records amounts of cash.
It seems there is not enough cash kicking around to support government borrowing, business requirements & the mortgage market. At present it seems that the mortgage market & government seem to be getting the lions share. The ongoing impact of this will affect buyer's ability to pay and thus flow through to house prices.0 -
nollag2006 wrote: »Very disturbing that bears take such pleasure in seeing others lose their life savings, just so they can hold onto the vain hope that they can buy a house cheaply in the next few years.
Let me let you in on a secret ... it aint going to happen
Very disturbing that you see life savings as HPI wealth.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.6K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.5K Spending & Discounts
- 247.5K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.6K Life & Family
- 262K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards