We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Pensions, politics and tax
 
            
                
                    baby_boomer                
                
                    Posts: 3,883 Forumite
         
             
         
         
             
         
         
             
                         
            
                        
             
         
         
             
         
         
            
                    The Lib Dem manifesto follows Ros Altmann's proposal to abolish higher rate tax relief on pensions.
I personally think this is just a matter of time given the next government's desperate need for revenue over and above what all the parties are claiming they will need. None of their figures are going to add up which is why it seems a "phoney" election.
Unfortunately I doubt the proceeds will ever be used to further subsidise the pensions of basic rate taxpayers - as Altmann would like.
The money saved will just go into general tax revenues.
Abolition of higher rate tax relief on pensions will feature as a big issue should there be a hung parliament and one the LibDems will push hard with their chosen governing partner given their "fairness" election agenda in order to position themselves for any subsequent election as there was in 1974 after a hung parliament.
What is the situation in other countries? If this proposal came in, would it make the UK a less attractive place for top executives considering working for a British company because the UK was out on a limb on this issue?
                I personally think this is just a matter of time given the next government's desperate need for revenue over and above what all the parties are claiming they will need. None of their figures are going to add up which is why it seems a "phoney" election.
Unfortunately I doubt the proceeds will ever be used to further subsidise the pensions of basic rate taxpayers - as Altmann would like.
The money saved will just go into general tax revenues.
Abolition of higher rate tax relief on pensions will feature as a big issue should there be a hung parliament and one the LibDems will push hard with their chosen governing partner given their "fairness" election agenda in order to position themselves for any subsequent election as there was in 1974 after a hung parliament.
What is the situation in other countries? If this proposal came in, would it make the UK a less attractive place for top executives considering working for a British company because the UK was out on a limb on this issue?
0        
            Comments
- 
            Fair or what?
 "State pension to rise in line with earnings, by 2.5% per year or in line with the Retail Price Index measure of inflation - whichever is highest"
 I'd love to know the LibDem costings for this largesse to my generation.0
- 
            baby_boomer wrote: »Fair or what?
 "State pension to rise in line with earnings, by 2.5% per year or in line with the Retail Price Index measure of inflation - whichever is highest"
 I'd love to know the LibDem costings for this largesse to my generation.
 Higher
 Earnings has always been the higher which explains why we get more prosperous and why the state pays out only on RPIThe only thing that is constant is change.0
- 
            zygurat789 wrote: »Higher
 Earnings has always been the higher which explains why we get more prosperous and why the state pays out only on RPI
 Nope - highest.
 There were three "options", not two - earnings, 2.5% or inflation.0
- 
            I believe both Labour and Conservatives have committed to re-establishing the link between the state pension and earnings although I can't remember when its due to happen.0
- 
            it would seem that labour will restore the earnings link in 2012; the torys were going to match that but are now saying 2015
 so thats all three parties then
 http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/personalfinance/pensions/6221915/State-pension-will-be-linked-to-earnings-despite-cuts-Tories-say.html0
- 
            
- 
            
- 
            baby_boomer wrote: »The Lib Dem manifesto follows Ros Altmann's proposal to abolish higher rate tax relief on pensions.
 I still haven't seen what the politicians like to call "joined up thinking" on this one. If an individual on gets basic relief but then is taxed at a higher rate in retirement on 75% of the fund, its a waste of time.
 If the relief is capped, then so must the tax be on benefits.0
- 
            If the relief is capped, then so must the tax be on benefits.
 Wouldn't be enough for me to continue using pensions to invest - I wouldn't believe that the 'unfair, overly generous tax breaks given to the wealthiest who need them least' (or whatever political rhetoric is the order of the day) wouldn't be taken away at some point before I reached retirement.
 I'd be moving pensions well down the list of options, behind SSISAs, VCTs and full use of CGT allowance.0
- 
            At the moment in politics, its fashionable to bash those that are higher earners. Especially the way they justify increases in taxation on higher earners as it hits the bankers. In reality, the vast majority of bankers are low paid and the changes will actually hit middle management and professionals more than bankers.I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.0
This discussion has been closed.
            Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
 
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
 
         