We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Question on Renting in Pension Years
Comments
-
-
-
thats correct, current rules are you can under-occupy a socially rented property for as long as you like
But wouldn't your LHA be reduced?I'm a Forum Ambassador on the housing, mortgages & student money saving boards. I volunteer to help get your forum questions answered and keep the forum running smoothly. Forum Ambassadors are not moderators and don't read every post. If you spot an illegal or inappropriate post then please report it to forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com (it's not part of my role to deal with this). Any views are mine and not the official line of MoneySavingExpert.com.0 -
Probably but social housing rents are cheaper than private and it would still cover it0
-
But wouldn't your LHA be reduced?Probably but social housing rents are cheaper than private and it would still cover itWe cannot change anything unless we accept it. Condemnation does not liberate, it oppresses. Carl Jung
0 -
Thank you for the replies. I guess the reason the government wants us to buy our own houses rather than rent is so that they don't have to give handouts (under what ever name) to the ever increasing retired population.
My friend is 36 and bought her first house in May 2007. She and her husband had saved for years and years to put down a large deposit on their first home. They wanted their own home when they decided to start a family. However, now their daughter is 3 and they have to select schools they need to move area because the local schools are dreadful.
It is very sad because they bought at the peak their house is now worth a lot less. I believe their hard saved deposit has gone and they may be in negative equity.
They have decided to sell it and rent in a better area which is out of their budget to buy. She is concerned because they probably won't be able to buy a house again and she wondered what would happen in 30 years time and they retire.0 -
What happens in areas of Europe where there is more emphasise on ranting rather than buying?
I don't think you have to go as far away as Europe for an answer to that question. Plenty of ranting instead of buying going on in here."I can hear you whisperin', children, so I know you're down there. I can feel myself gettin' awful mad. I'm out of patience, children. I'm coming to find you now." - Harry Powell, Night of the Hunter, 1955.0 -
HAMISH_MCTAVISH wrote: »I don't for one moment believe that the council can buy and fit a basic kitchen any cheaper than I can, or rather, they probably could, but I doubt they do.... Not by the time you include all the "administration" costs.
they could, but because of public sector procurement policies, they will have signed an exclusive contract with one provider. in the tendering process this provider will have appeared to be the cheapest, but because the council will effectively let the provider write the contract, they end up with a ridiculously expensive provider locked in on a 3 year deal. in the end it will probably cost them 2x what it would cost you.0 -
What happens in areas of Europe where there is more emphasise on ranting rather than buying?Harry_Powell wrote: »I don't think you have to go as far away as Europe for an answer to that question. Plenty of ranting instead of buying going on in here.
Yes, very good. :rotfl:0 -
Thank you for the replies. I guess the reason the government wants us to buy our own houses rather than rent is so that they don't have to give handouts (under what ever name) to the ever increasing retired population.
My friend is 36 and bought her first house in May 2007. She and her husband had saved for years and years to put down a large deposit on their first home. They wanted their own home when they decided to start a family. However, now their daughter is 3 and they have to select schools they need to move area because the local schools are dreadful.
It is very sad because they bought at the peak their house is now worth a lot less. I believe their hard saved deposit has gone and they may be in negative equity.
They have decided to sell it and rent in a better area which is out of their budget to buy. She is concerned because they probably won't be able to buy a house again and she wondered what would happen in 30 years time and they retire.
didnt they think of the schools when buying or were they going to sell up in a few years anyway?
if so, im not being funny but thats financial mismanagement anyway, she couldnt expect prices to go up (or down). how 'dreadful' are the schools anyway, probably not bad enough that they have to move0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.4K Life & Family
- 258.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards