We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

are the banks 'giving away' mortgages again?

AbbieCadabra
AbbieCadabra Posts: 1,714 Forumite
Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
edited 28 October 2011 at 10:01AM in Mortgages & endowments
deleted.....
«1

Comments

  • AbbieCadabra
    AbbieCadabra Posts: 1,714 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    edited 11 April 2010 at 11:43AM
    deleted (was in response to opinions4u who's now deleted their reply...)
  • Thrugelmir
    Thrugelmir Posts: 89,546 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Nothing wrong with 90% mortgages. What matters more is the income multiple they are borrowing on.

    If they've saved a deposit maybe they've also sorted out their personal financial issues as well.

    Your comments are assumptive as you don't have all the facts.
  • AbbieCadabra
    AbbieCadabra Posts: 1,714 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    edited 28 October 2011 at 10:00AM
    deleted.......
  • KimYeovil
    KimYeovil Posts: 6,156 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Three times joint salary and a 90% mortgage is scary? Do not understand. Completely affordable.
  • AbbieCadabra
    AbbieCadabra Posts: 1,714 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    edited 28 October 2011 at 10:00AM
    deleted.....
  • 3x joint income is only affordable if both people continue to work full time. If one gets sacked, sick, made redundant or pregnant, the remaining worker has to pay a mortgage that is 6x salary. And that's if they both earn the same.

    I earn less than my boyfriend so if we borrowed 3x joint income and he got made redundant, I'd be trying to pay a mortgage that's 7.5x my salary. The max I'm willing to borrow is 2.25x joint, as the mortgage and bills on that matches my take home pay. Any more and I would not be able to cover the essentials on my own.
  • VIGILANT22
    VIGILANT22 Posts: 2,516 Forumite
    3x joint income is only affordable if both people continue to work full time. If one gets sacked, sick, made redundant or pregnant, the remaining worker has to pay a mortgage that is 6x salary. And that's if they both earn the same.
    QUOTE]

    Hmmm....That's the point of insurance!
  • VIGILANT22 wrote: »
    3x joint income is only affordable if both people continue to work full time. If one gets sacked, sick, made redundant or pregnant, the remaining worker has to pay a mortgage that is 6x salary. And that's if they both earn the same.
    QUOTE]

    Hmmm....That's the point of insurance!

    To answer both parts quoted...for a mortgage to remain affordable, it's not always necessary for the two salaries to remain. People's circumstances change. In many cases, income will go up with time and so there may be a time where one partner can take over the mortgage while the other isn't earning (this commonly happens where a couple start to have children for example). Many people will take on a mortgage with this in mind.

    Insurance will only cover some eventualities - for example, it's not available for pre-existing conditions or pregnancy etc!
  • VIGILANT22
    VIGILANT22 Posts: 2,516 Forumite
    [QUOTE=milliebear00001
    Insurance will only cover some eventualities - for example, it's not available for pre-existing conditions or pregnancy etc![/QUOTE]

    Did you notice what I highlighted....I NEVER highligted pregnacy.....

    If people take on a mortgage and can't afford to insurance against the risks...they can't afford it in the first place........
  • VIGILANT22 wrote: »
    Did you notice what I highlighted....I NEVER highligted pregnacy.....

    I don't recall saying you did...

    If people take on a mortgage and can't afford to insurance against the risks...they can't afford it in the first place........

    I don't recall saying it was about affording the insurance, merely that you can't actually buy insurance for every eventuality...

    ..........................................................................
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.4K Life & Family
  • 261.4K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.