We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Repaying CCJ by DLS/Hillesden Secs

Hi

Currently have a CCJ registered against me by Hillesden Secs Ltd, they have also placed a charging order on my house. (Originally from Citibank CreditCard).

I am in a position to pay the money to Hillesden now but after reading some of the threads re: this mob I wonder if i am doing the right thing. Have also read somewhere that i might be able to have the Judgement set aside?

Obviously am keen to get CCJ satisfied and charge removed but bit worried about parting with nearly £6k.

Does anyone have any helpful suggestions please

Tom :idea:
«1

Comments

  • DarkConvict
    DarkConvict Posts: 6,347 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    You can get the CCJ set aside, usually only if you knew nothing about it or another good reason for why it should be overturned - http://www.nationaldebtline.co.uk/england_wales/factsheet.php?page=12_how_to_set_aside_a_judgment_in_the_county_court

    As to paying them, and there reputation. I have no idea.
    Although no trees were harmed during the creation of this post, a large number of electrons were greatly inconvenienced.

    There are two ways of constructing a software design: One way is to make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies, and the other way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious deficiencies
  • Tom1963
    Tom1963 Posts: 6 Forumite
    Yes ta for that
  • 10past6
    10past6 Posts: 4,962 Forumite
    Tom1963 wrote: »
    Does anyone have any helpful suggestions please
    How old is the CO?

    At the time of receiving the court papers, did you "admit" the debt?
    Click here for Martins (MSE) advice on who to contact with Debt Issues - YOU HAVE NO REASON TO USE A FEE PAYING DEBT MANAGEMENT COMPANY- THEY CANNOT DO ANYMORE FOR YOU THAN THOSE LISTED IN MY LINK ABOVE.

    All information given by myself is offered informally and without prejudice - if in doubt seek help from a qualified and insured professional
  • Tom1963
    Tom1963 Posts: 6 Forumite
    Thanks 10Past6

    No admission made to anything I had never heard of this company. Charging order made appx 2 years ago.
  • DarkConvict
    DarkConvict Posts: 6,347 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Sounds like you have grounds to set the CCJ/CO aside as you were never contacted then.
    Although no trees were harmed during the creation of this post, a large number of electrons were greatly inconvenienced.

    There are two ways of constructing a software design: One way is to make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies, and the other way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious deficiencies
  • Tom1963
    Tom1963 Posts: 6 Forumite
    I was contacted by letter but no admission was made
  • DarkConvict
    DarkConvict Posts: 6,347 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    When were you contacted about it? Did you know about the CCJ/CO but choose not to return the paperwork?
    Although no trees were harmed during the creation of this post, a large number of electrons were greatly inconvenienced.

    There are two ways of constructing a software design: One way is to make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies, and the other way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious deficiencies
  • Tom1963
    Tom1963 Posts: 6 Forumite
    The painful answer to that one is yes!
  • DarkConvict
    DarkConvict Posts: 6,347 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    You may struggle to get the CCJ setaside if you chose to ignore the paperwork, because they will be sure they had sent it to the correct address.
    I assume you have sent the form back 10past6 helped with. Wait for a reply on that.
    http://www.nationaldebtline.co.uk/england_wales/factsheet.php?page=12_how_to_set_aside_a_judgment_in_the_county_court
    I DID NOT GET THE COURT PAPERS
    If you did not get the court papers through the post the court will not always agree that this is a good reason to set aside the judgment. The court is allowed to send the papers to your usual or last known address (even if you have moved). If you have given your creditors your new address then they should contact you there.

    If they still send the papers to your old address then you may have good reason for the judgment to be set aside.

    If you did not get the claim form, you will usually need to show you have a defence or other good reason as well, for the court to set aside the judgment unless:

    you can prove you gave the creditor your new address;
    the claim was not made following the rules, for example, they were sent to the wrong address, lost in the post; or
    the post office returned the claim papers as they were not able to deliver them.
    Although no trees were harmed during the creation of this post, a large number of electrons were greatly inconvenienced.

    There are two ways of constructing a software design: One way is to make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies, and the other way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious deficiencies
  • 10past6
    10past6 Posts: 4,962 Forumite
    Tom1963 wrote: »
    I was contacted by letter but no admission was made
    You'll struggle to get the CCJ / CO set aside, failure to acknowledge the original court claim results in a CCJ by default.

    If the claimant made a “Forthwith Judgement” this allows them to apply for an “Interim Charging Order” which is part way to a full CO, if the ICO is not challenged by the defendant (you) the claimant may request the ICO be made full, i.e "Charging Order awarded"

    In your case, the court will claim, you had several opportunities along the way to “stop / question” any action the claimant was pursuing, as you failed to do so the “correct” steps by the court were applied, IMHO, you're better of saving your £75.00 set aside fee, however, as per my signature, and as I say to all other members, it's for you to decide on what action suites you best.


    Any questions feel free to ask

    Good luck ;)
    Click here for Martins (MSE) advice on who to contact with Debt Issues - YOU HAVE NO REASON TO USE A FEE PAYING DEBT MANAGEMENT COMPANY- THEY CANNOT DO ANYMORE FOR YOU THAN THOSE LISTED IN MY LINK ABOVE.

    All information given by myself is offered informally and without prejudice - if in doubt seek help from a qualified and insured professional
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.8K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.6K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.6K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.6K Life & Family
  • 262.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.