We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Company reclaiming training costs?

124»

Comments

  • jdturk
    jdturk Posts: 1,636 Forumite
    The OP would argue that he was forced to leave by the actions of his employer.


    Without going through the grievance procedure first I would find this a little hard to believe the company would lose
    Always ask ACAS
  • bristol_pilot
    bristol_pilot Posts: 2,235 Forumite
    The OP would need to take specialist advice. But I certainly wouldn't simply roll over and hand over £10k in the OP's situation.
  • jdturk
    jdturk Posts: 1,636 Forumite
    The OP would need to take specialist advice. But I certainly wouldn't simply roll over and hand over £10k in the OP's situation.


    I probably agree with you on this....
    Always ask ACAS
  • Thanks a lot. I'm certainly going to look into it. It's just not totally simple due to the fact my injury was done outside of work. But was made worse by the company. I will look into my options though!
  • Hiya,
    Your situation sounds really unfair and tbh your previous employers sound like heartless gits. I really would seek further advice either from a lawyer or a no win no fee lawyer or maybe the CAB or you can even get legal advice through your uni if you've started? If you don't have a big income then I'm not quite sure how they expect to reclaim the costs from you in large amounts.
    On a much much smaller scale I was paid some sick pay years ago during my first 3 months in a job. I then left the job soon after and although the boss had agreed it the company tried to reclaim it. Letters went backwards and forwards. I was a college student at the time. In the end they halved the debt because they knew they wouldn't be able to get it back from someone with no income unless they significantly reduced it. My point here is they will have to be flexible if they expect to get the money back. They can't get what you don't have. The courts would see it like this, but I'm sure you don't want that hassle. Get advice as soon as you can.
    All the best,
    C x
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259.1K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.