We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

how are all these final salary pensions going to be funded?

1356789

Comments

  • purch
    purch Posts: 9,865 Forumite
    If I hadn't had the flat and pension to tide me over I would never have been able to raise a family with my new Lithuanian wife.

    I went out with a Lithuanian girl for a while :j
    'In nature, there are neither rewards nor punishments - there are Consequences.'
  • Mr.Brown_4
    Mr.Brown_4 Posts: 1,109 Forumite
    purch wrote: »
    I went out with a Lithuanian girl for a while :j
    That may be the best use of an emoticon for a while...
  • aelitaman
    aelitaman Posts: 522 Forumite
    The councils will go bankrupt and renegage on the pension commitments and pay pence in the pound.
  • bodgerx
    bodgerx Posts: 190 Forumite
    I don't consider 'final salary' pensions to be as lucrative to the pensioner or as blood-sucking to the public sector organisations as many of you have made out.

    Not all funds are run at a deficit. I work for a County Council and the fund is healthy balanced with zero losses.

    The benefits of such schemes have been reduced significantly over the last few years - to the point where I'm even considering moving over to a stakeholder pension.

    Basically, a pension scheme should be a balanced book - regardless of whether it is public sector or private.
  • CLAPTON
    CLAPTON Posts: 41,865 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    bodgerx wrote: »
    I don't consider 'final salary' pensions to be as lucrative to the pensioner or as blood-sucking to the public sector organisations as many of you have made out.

    Not all funds are run at a deficit. I work for a County Council and the fund is healthy balanced with zero losses.

    The benefits of such schemes have been reduced significantly over the last few years - to the point where I'm even considering moving over to a stakeholder pension.

    Basically, a pension scheme should be a balanced book - regardless of whether it is public sector or private.

    please tell us which county council

    please tell us how the scheme has been reduced and how you are better off in a stakeholder scheme
  • treliac
    treliac Posts: 4,524 Forumite
    Mr.Brown wrote: »
    That may be the best use of an emoticon for a while...

    Mr Brown, if you ever come onto the dating market.... there'll be a mad stampede of females beating a path to your door.
  • bodgerx
    bodgerx Posts: 190 Forumite
    edited 5 March 2010 at 8:31AM
    CLAPTON wrote: »
    please tell us which county council

    please tell us how the scheme has been reduced and how you are better off in a stakeholder scheme

    Its a northern County Council.

    The reduction in final salary pension benefits in the public sector are well documented. e.g. rule of 85.

    Most employees have seen there contribution rate increase for no increased payout. I used to pay 6% whereas now I pay 6.75% - a lot have seen it increase by more. There is no flexibility in this rate either - it's either that or nothing.
  • Davesnave
    Davesnave Posts: 34,741 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    My index-linked is pretty average, but I also have a smallish private pension. However, I want my cake and eat it, so I'm also setting up a new business which will earn diddly-squat for the first few years. With a bit of luck, that could mean a few years of Tax Credits, before I qualify for my State Pension, of course.

    Then I'll sell the business.

    B'stard baby boomers, eh?:rotfl:
  • Old_Slaphead
    Old_Slaphead Posts: 2,749 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    edited 5 March 2010 at 10:06AM
    bodgerx wrote: »
    Its a northern County Council.

    The reduction in final salary pension benefits in the public sector are well documented. e.g. rule of 85.

    Most employees have seen there contribution rate increase for no increased payout. I used to pay 6% whereas now I pay 6.75% - a lot have seen it increase by more. There is no flexibility in this rate either - it's either that or nothing.

    Do please tell us which northern council is it - I'd like to see what they are doing right which all other councils cannot replicate. They're likely to publish their accounts and I'd like to have a boochas.

    BTW the 6.75% before tax that you contribute goes NOWHERE NEAR funding your pension entitlement (the taxpayer is contributing another 20+%).

    The 3 yearly funding review - due to take place this month, will show the state of underprovision in all it's aweful glory.
  • How are all these final salary pensions going to be funded?

    The simple answer is, they won't. It's yet another pyramid scheme much like the housing market, that requires unlimited funding shoved in at the bottom for it to work.

    Unfortunately, just like the housing market, it's been backed into a corner so far that there is really no way out. Those people under 40 or even 50 who are retiring at 65 (or is 68 ? funny that hey) will likely see nothing from any kind of private pension, nor will these people who think they've got a gold plated one from the public sector.

    We are going to see an unraveling of most of what we consider normal over the next 2 decades, the start of which was Aut 2008.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 245K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.4K Life & Family
  • 258.8K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.