We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
The full working week should be cut to 21 hours
Graham_Devon
Posts: 58,560 Forumite
Says a left-wing thinktank.
Are these guys completely off their rockers?
Who's actually paying for such stupid research?
They seem to have completely missed the problem of something called paying bills.
I'm going to suggest such reasearchers should have their hours cut to nothing.
http://newsvote.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/8513783.stmThe working week should be cut to 21 hours to help boost the economy and improve quality of life, a left-wing think tank has said.
The New Economics Foundation claimed in a report the reduction in hours would help to ease unemployment and overwork.
The think tank said people were working longer hours now than 30 years ago even though unemployment was at 2.5 million.
Are these guys completely off their rockers?
Who's actually paying for such stupid research?
They seem to have completely missed the problem of something called paying bills.
I'm going to suggest such reasearchers should have their hours cut to nothing.
0
Comments
-
Graham_Devon wrote: »Are these guys completely off their rockers?
.
Ummmmmm........a left-wing think tank
I take it that was a rhetorical question Graham?“The great enemy of the truth is very often not the lie – deliberate, contrived, and dishonest – but the myth, persistent, persuasive, and unrealistic.
Belief in myths allows the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought.”
-- President John F. Kennedy”0 -
Graham_Devon wrote: »Says a left-wing thinktank.
http://newsvote.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/8513783.stm
Are these guys completely off their rockers?
Who's actually paying for such stupid research?
They seem to have completely missed the problem of something called paying bills.
I'm going to suggest such reasearchers should have their hours cut to nothing.
Well to be fair it could cut unemployment and overwork , I doubt they were instructed to research anymore then that :rotfl:Vuja De - the feeling you'll be here later0 -
it's a romantic idea that could maybe work in communist russia but not the best idea for the UK0
-
Maybe if the internet were banned at work we might be able to do 20 hour weeks.0
-
Well hours of work were much higher at the start of the century and you could argue that future productivity increases might be split between shorter hours and higher wages.0
-
Many people working full time do a 21 hour week although they attend work for 40 hours. Step forward MSE users who log in and post at work.............:-)" The greatest wealth is to live content with little."
Plato0 -
lilac_lady wrote: »Many people working full time do a 21 hour week although they attend work for 40 hours. Step forward MSE users who log in and post at work.............:-)
This is ture.
However, not every job revolves round a factory line where every minute of work = higher output.
What for instance would you suggest a tech support guy does if he has spent time creating protocols and infrastructure which means problems are less frequent and the phone hasn't rung for 10 mins?
He / She has to be there.
What about a shop worker who has the internet in front of them and no customers and the shop is all fine. What should they do?0 -
lilac_lady wrote: »Many people working full time do a 21 hour week although they attend work for 40 hours. Step forward MSE users who log in and post at work.............:-)
You just copied my idea!0 -
Maybe I'm being overly cynical but I can't help thinking this is yet another example of an organisation seeking free publicity by publishing a radical proposal which the media then slavishly report.
The proposal was debated on Radio 4's Today programme this morning, with Anna Coote from the New Economics Foundation versus a spokesman from the Institute of Economic Affairs. As the latter pointed out, we already have a large and growing number of employees who have opted to work part-time for a better work:life balance.
The answer, if we're concerned about improving work:life balance, is to extend the opportunities for employees to switch to part-time working wherever practicable. But to suggest, as the NEF does, that everyone be limited to a 21 hour working week with a massive loss of income is just barking mad.0 -
Maybe I'm being overly cynical but I can't help thinking this is yet another example of an organisation seeking free publicity by publishing a radical proposal which the media then slavishly report.
The proposal was debated on Radio 4's Today programme this morning, with Anna Coote from the New Economics Foundation versus a spokesman from the Institute of Economic Affairs. As the latter pointed out, we already have a large and growing number of employees who have opted to work part-time for a better work:life balance.
Think Tanks have to get publicity and influence the debate and the reporting is somewhat sensationalists too. It seems there report is not really suggesting an overnight change. I think it is highly likely the working week will shorten or holidays increase, it seems that the labour market is becoming more flexible.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.3K Spending & Discounts
- 247.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.3K Life & Family
- 261.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
